首页> 外文OA文献 >Elektroniska konossement i Sverige. Elektroniska registreringar och reglerna för konossement.
【2h】

Elektroniska konossement i Sverige. Elektroniska registreringar och reglerna för konossement.

机译:瑞典的电子账单。电子注册和提单规则。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While this summary is written in English, the paper published is written in Swedish.The paper concerns itself with the legal status of electronic transport records in a Swedish context. The main question asked is whether rules for bills of lading should be applied to electronic transport records, or if they should be treated according to general rules. A secondary question is asked; partially to help put the main question into context and partially to see whether the different legal regimes will lead to different solutions to an issue. This second question is if electronic transport records can effect the transfer of property (sv. sakrätt). In my attempt to answer these questions I review different sources of law, in a broad sense of the expression. I also attempt to discern in what aspects there is a functional difference between traditional paper bills of lading and electronic transport records.My conclusion is that electronic transport records should not be treated according to the rules on bills of lading. The reasons for this are several, and originate both from the difference in function as well as how legislation on similar issues has previously been created in Sweden. However, it appears that applying general rules will largely lead to the same results, through a different legal path. This at least appears to be the case when it comes to transfer of property under the currently used systems for electronic transport records, one of the main areas where mandatory rules may clash with the terms of the contracts.
机译:该摘要使用英语撰写,而发表的论文则用瑞典语撰写。该论文涉及瑞典语环境中电子运输记录的法律地位。提出的主要问题是,是否应将提单规则应用于电子运输记录,或者是否应按照一般规则来处理。提出第二个问题。部分目的是帮助将主要问题置于上下文中,部分目的是查看不同的法律制度是否会导致对问题的不同解决方案。第二个问题是电子运输记录是否可以影响财产的转让(萨克拉特诉)。为了回答这些问题,我从广义上回顾了不同的法律渊源。我还试图辨别传统的纸质提单和电子运输记录在哪些方面存在功能上的区别。我的结论是,电子运输记录不应按照提单的规则来处理。造成这种情况的原因是多方面的,既源于功能上的差异,也源于瑞典以前如何制定类似问题的立法。但是,似乎应用一般规则将通过不同的法律途径在很大程度上产生相同的结果。至少在当前使用的电子运输记录系统下进行财产转移时似乎是这种情况,这是强制性规则可能与合同条款发生冲突的主要领域之一。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jansson Erik;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 swe
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号