首页> 外文OA文献 >Risk and Uncertainty in Banking Sector -A study of the Post-Earnings Announcement Drift in European banks - Did the market reflect the banks' exposure to risk before the magnitude of the financial crisis was a fact?
【2h】

Risk and Uncertainty in Banking Sector -A study of the Post-Earnings Announcement Drift in European banks - Did the market reflect the banks' exposure to risk before the magnitude of the financial crisis was a fact?

机译:银行业的风险和不确定性 - 对收益后公告的研究欧洲银行的漂移 - 在金融危机发生之前,市场是否反映了银行面临的风险?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and ProblemWhen the financial crisis started in 2007, the attention was directed towards the risks that the banking sector was exposed to. The information asymmetry between the banks and the market caused uncertainty for the investors, and this uncertainty had to be taken into consideration for investment decisions and would affect the asset pricing (Bird & Yeung, 2012). Exposure to risks is a natural part of the banking sector, however, the question is to what extent the investors understand these risks, and how much of the uncertainty caused by these risks that they incorporate in their investment decision process. In this research the amount of credit losses and the banks’ liquidity status after the financial crisis is used as a measurement of how well the banks managed the crisis. The level of the banks’ exposure to risks can therefore be measured with these two proxies and the phenomenon Post-Earnings Announcement Drift (PEAD) can be examined to detect the uncertainty that the market perceive. Also, the auditors’ role in limiting the uncertainty for the investors is examined through comparing the market’s reaction after the earnings’ announcement in the unaudited Q1-Q3 reports and the audited Q4 report. The investors’ reaction to earnings’ announcement is investigated to provide insights into whether the uncertainty the investors faced did affect their investment decisions and if they, with the answer in hand, did foresee which banks would manage the crisis and which ones would fail.PurposeThe purpose of this research is to investigate if a relationship can be observed between the stock prices and the uncertainty that the market is facing due to potential risks in the banking sector.MethodThe method used to find answers to the research questions is to analyze the phenomenon Post-Earnings Announcement Drift in listed banks in Europe during the years 2005-2009. The investors’ reaction to earnings’ announcement is investigated to provide insights into whether the uncertainty the investors faced did affect their investment decisions. The PEAD is measured as the relation between the Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR) and the Standardized Unexpected Earnings (SUE), where the size of the CAR explains to which extent the unexpected earnings cause an effect on the stock prices.ConclusionFrom this study the authors cannot claim that there is a difference in PEAD for the banks that did not manage the crisis well, compared to the banks that maintained stability through the crisis. Based on this research, the conclusion is that the market did not foresee which banks that would manage the crisis and which ones that would not. However, this study does indicate that some form of investors’ uncertainty has been captured. Significant difference among some of the groups has been observed where the liquidity was testes as a proxy for the risk exposure. Furthermore, from the results the authors cannot claim that the differences in PEAD between the quarters could be derived from the auditors’ role of limiting risk for the investors.
机译:背景和问题2007年金融危机爆发时,注意力集中在银行业面临的风险上。银行与市场之间的信息不对称给投资者带来了不确定性,这种不确定性必须在投资决策中加以考虑,并会影响资产定价(Bird&Yeung,2012)。风险暴露是银行业的自然组成部分,但是问题是,投资者在多大程度上了解这些风险,以及在投资决策过程中这些风险所带来的不确定性有多大?在这项研究中,信用损失的数量和金融危机后银行的流动性状况被用来衡量银行如何处理危机。因此,可以使用这两个代理来衡量银行的风险敞口水平,并且可以检查盈余公告偏差(PEAD)现象,以检测市场感知的不确定性。此外,通过比较未经审计的第一季度至第三季度报告和经审计的第四季度收益公布后市场的反应,来检验审计师在限制投资者不确定性方面的作用。调查了投资者对收益公告的反应,以洞悉投资者所面临的不确定性是否确实影响了他们的投资决策,以及他们是否掌握了答案,是否预见了哪些银行将应对危机以及哪些银行将破产。这项研究的目的是调查是否可以观察到股价与银行业潜在风险导致的市场不确定性之间的关系。方法寻找研究问题答案的方法是分析现象-2005-2009年期间,欧洲上市银行的盈余公告有所变动。调查了投资者对收益公告的反应,以洞悉投资者所面临的不确定性是否确实影响了他们的投资决策。 PEAD的度量是累积异常收益(CAR)与标准非预期收益(SUE)之间的关系,其中CAR的大小解释了意外收益在多大程度上对股价产生了影响。不能断言,与在危机中保持稳定的银行相比,管理得不好的银行的PEAD有所不同。根据这项研究,得出的结论是,市场没有预见到哪些银行将管理这场危机,而哪些银行则不会。但是,这项研究确实表明已经捕获了某种形式的投资者不确定性。在以流动性作为风险敞口替代品的睾丸中,已经观察到某些组之间的显着差异。此外,从结果中,作者不能声称季度之间PEAD的差异可能源于审计师为投资者限制风险的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号