首页> 外文OA文献 >Criminal Records in Sweden. Regulation of Access to Criminal Records and the use of Criminal Background Checks by Employers.
【2h】

Criminal Records in Sweden. Regulation of Access to Criminal Records and the use of Criminal Background Checks by Employers.

机译:瑞典的犯罪记录。对犯罪记录的获取和雇主使用犯罪背景调查的规定。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis examines the regulation of access to criminal records in Sweden and the actual and potential use of criminal background checks by employers in hiring processes. In recent years, more and more Swedish employers have been required by law to check their job applicants’ criminal records. In a parallel process, also the number of enforced subject access requests has increased considerably in that same period. The aim of this thesis is to analyse and explain these two trends and consider their implications for future use of criminal records in Sweden and elsewhere. The analysis draws upon government documents, newspaper articles, interviews with employers using enforced subject access, and interviews with union and employer organization representatives, with the aim of capturing the vocabularies of motive that were evoked and put to use in attempts to justify and legitimize either access restrictions or the extended use of criminal records data in hiring decisions.In Paper I, I examine how subject access, indirect employer access, and the notion of privacy have been understood and defined throughout the history of the Swedish Criminal Records Registry, and how practices and policies in the area have evolved over time.In Paper II, I investigate how employers who use individuals’ right to subject access as ameans for obtaining copies of their criminal record account for their practice, and how unions and employer associations have responded to the adoption of it.In Paper III, I challenge the ‘governmentality’ tradition in criminology and the way the useof criminal record checks is interpreted within it. As an alternative way of formulating andunderstanding the issue, I propose that it be looked at from a symbolic perspective.In Paper IV, my analysis utilizes the perspective of the sociology of scandals to help develop a better understanding of function creep in the area of data protection. This I do through an examination of the process leading, first, to the introduction of mandatory vetting of childcare workers and teachers in Sweden in 2001, and, then, to the inclusion later on of also other employercategories in the scope of the relevant legislation.Based on these analyses, I argue that the changes in the access to individuals’ criminal records reflect the state’s way of governing the interpretation of the criminal records database. Whether actors are denied or allowed access to information contained in the criminal history record database depends on the prevailing cultural representations regarding notions such as ‘privacy’, ‘data protection’, ‘databases’, ‘sensitive information’, and ‘power’. Moreover, I arguethat the function creep in the use of criminal history data in Sweden can be initially explained by the occurrence and publicity of scandals that highlight the vulnerability of a group of dependents, making it defensible to resort to privacy-intrusive methods such as criminal record checks, with the continuing function creep then being made possible by a changing moral landscape that, following the initial amendment, renders the method morally more defensible among the policy makers and the public at large.
机译:本文研究了瑞典在获取犯罪记录方面的规定以及雇主在雇用过程中对犯罪背景调查的实际和潜在使用。近年来,越来越多的瑞典雇主被法律要求检查其应聘者的犯罪记录。在并行过程中,同一时期内强制执行的主题访问请求的数量也大大增加。本文的目的是分析和解释这两种趋势,并考虑它们对将来在瑞典和其他地方使用犯罪记录的影响。该分析利用政府文件,报纸文章,使用强制性主题访问对雇主进行的采访以及对工会和雇主组织代表的采访,目的是捕获被唤起并用来证明其正当性和合法性的动机词汇。访问限制或犯罪记录数据在雇用决策中的广泛使用。在论文I中,我研究了瑞典犯罪记录注册局的整个历史如何理解和定义了主题访问,间接雇主访问和隐私概念,以及如何随着时间的推移,该领域的实践和政策也在不断发展。在论文二中,我研究了雇主如何利用个人的受调查权作为获取其犯罪记录副本的手段,以及工会和雇主协会如何做出回应。在论文三中,我挑战了犯罪学中的“政府”传统及其方法。在其中解释了犯罪记录检查的用途。作为提出和理解该问题的另一种方法,我建议从象征性的角度进行审视。在论文四中,我的分析利用丑闻的社会学角度来帮助人们更好地理解数据领域的功能蠕变。保护。我通过对以下过程的审查来做到这一点:首先在2001年对瑞典的托儿工人和教师进行强制审查,然后再将其他雇主类别纳入相关法律的范围。基于这些分析,我认为访问个人犯罪记录的方式的变化反映了国家管理犯罪记录数据库解释的方式。行为者是否被拒绝还是被允许访问犯罪历史记录数据库中包含的信息取决于有关“隐私”,“数据保护”,“数据库”,“敏感信息”和“权力”等概念的主流文化表示形式。此外,我认为,瑞典犯罪历史数据使用中的功能蔓延可以首先通过丑闻的发生和宣传来解释,这些丑闻凸显了一组受抚养者的脆弱性,因此可以诉诸于诸如刑事犯罪等侵犯隐私的方法记录检查,然后通过不断变化的道德环境使职能得以继续发展,随着最初的修订,该方法在道德上在政策制定者和广大公众中更具防御性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Backman Christel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号