首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing Open Source and Proprietary Enterprise Content Management Systems: Alfresco Compared to IBM Lotus Domino Document Manager Integrated with IBM Lotus WorkFlow
【2h】

Comparing Open Source and Proprietary Enterprise Content Management Systems: Alfresco Compared to IBM Lotus Domino Document Manager Integrated with IBM Lotus WorkFlow

机译:比较开源和专有企业内容管理系统:alfresco与IBm Lotus Domino Document manager集成,与IBm Lotus WorkFlow集成

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis is a part of the current discussions of open source versus proprietarysoftware for Swedish authorities. A new governmental policy has been establishedfor which the purpose is to spread the use of open source software andthereby save governmental funds and to increase quality.A case study has been conducted about an enterprise content managementsolution for the authority the Swedish Armed Forces. Enterprise content managementis not a new product category but an integrated approach to handle alltypes of content. The solution is required in order for the authority to conformto current Swedish laws. Two candidate systems are compared against the requirementsfor the solution, were one is open source and the other is proprietary.The first research question addresses the argument of open source softwarelacking features. The result implies that open source software provides an equivalentset of features.The second, third and fourth research questions address implications forSwedish authorities of choosing an open source or a propriety system.The organizational implications are of democratic interest. Open sourceincreases the organizational transparency by making source code public, whichallows automated decisions to be examined. All citizens of Sweden are by lawgranted access to records that are not classified. Why should this not apply tothe source code used by Swedish authorities as well?Another possible organizational implication could originate from an unexpectedmulti-national scenario. It could become disastrous if Swedish authoritiesare dependent on abroad organizations which could not provide critical support.Skills and know-how should be supplied within the country.The economic implications are profound. The Swedish authorities are currentlypurchasing solutions based on proprietary software from private companies.When the projects are finished, the companies are able to sell the samesolutions again to other authorities for the same amount of money. Governmentalfunds could be much better spent if the authorities choose an open sourcesolution and share the source code and experiences with each other.
机译:本文是瑞典当局针对开源软件与专有软件进行的当前讨论的一部分。已经制定了一项新的政府政策,其目的是推广使用开源软件,从而节省政府资金并提高质量。案例研究针对瑞典武装部队当局的企业内容管理解决方案。企业内容管理不是新产品类别,而是处理所有类型内容的集成方法。为了使授权机构符合当前的瑞典法律,需要该解决方案。将两个候选系统与该解决方案的需求进行了比较,一个是开源的,另一个是专有的。第一个研究问题是关于开源软件缺乏功能的争论。结果表明,开源软件提供了同等的功能集。第二,第三和第四个研究问题解决了瑞典当局选择开源或专有系统的含义。组织的含义具有民主意义。开源通过公开源代码来提高组织的透明度,从而可以检查自动决策。瑞典所有公民均可通过法律访问未分类的记录。为什么这也不适用于瑞典当局使用的源代码?另一个可能的组织含义可能来自意外的跨国场景。如果瑞典当局依赖不能提供关键支持的国外组织,那将是灾难性的。应在该国内部提供技能和专门知识,其经济意义深远。瑞典当局目前正在从私人公司购买基于专有软件的解决方案。项目完成后,这些公司可以再次以相同的价格将相同的解决方案出售给其他当局。如果当局选择开放源代码解决方案并彼此共享源代码和经验,则政府资金的花费会更好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Andersson Daniel G.R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号