首页> 外文OA文献 >Organizational structure in the hospitality industry : a comparative analysis of hotel real estate investment trusts (REITs) and hotel C-Corporations
【2h】

Organizational structure in the hospitality industry : a comparative analysis of hotel real estate investment trusts (REITs) and hotel C-Corporations

机译:酒店业的组织结构:酒店房地产投资信托(REITs)和酒店C-Corporations的比较分析

摘要

Current legislation has made it possible for real estate investment trusts (REITs) to earn income beyond purely passive sources such as rents from real property or interest from mortgages on real property. As a result, both the number and market capitalization of hotel REITs have substantially increased, and the difference between hotel REITs and hotel C-corporations has narrowed. However, companies such as Starwood Hotels have reverted back to the C-corporation structure. Given these organizational changes and the increasing dominance of hotel REITs, there is a need to analyze hotel REITs and hotel C-corporations in a comparative framework. Equity REITs and C-corporations have been studied extensively. However, research on various organizational forms in the hospitality industry is somewhat limited. This study attempts to fill this gap by comparing the stock market performance of publicly traded hotel REITs with hotel C-Corporations from 1993 to 2011. Furthermore, the impact of significant events such as mergers and acquisitions and legislative amendments on firms' stock price are also observed. Finally, detailed case studies of companies that underwent corporate restructuring are conducted. The research objective of this thesis is to examine (a) whether REITs are an efficient organizational structure for the lodging industry; and (b) whether the tax benefits of REITs offset the regulatory constraints they face. The study infers that REIT acquirers have an advantage in mergers and acquisitions, but in all other situations, the net benefits of REITs are not as clear. On market cap basis, the performance of hotel REITs and hotel C-Corporations was almost identical, however when equally weighted, hotel REITs outperformed their C-Corporation counterparts. In addition, the results show that the REIT returns are highly volatile. On a broad level the hospitality business has two distinct segments -- ownership of hotels and management of hotels and the degree of operating flexibility offered is one of the main factors that differentiate REITs from the C-Corporation counterparts. Therefore, this study concludes that the choice of corporate structure depends greatly on a firm's business strategy.
机译:当前的立法使房地产投资信托(REIT)能够获得纯被动来源以外的收入,例如房地产租金或房地产抵押贷款利息。结果,酒店房地产投资信托基金的数量和市值都大大增加了,酒店房地产投资信托基金与酒店C-公司之间的差异也缩小了。但是,喜达屋酒店等公司已恢复为C股份制结构。鉴于这些组织上的变化以及酒店房地产投资信托基金的日益增长的主导地位,有必要在一个比较框架内分析酒店房地产投资信托基金和酒店C-公司。股权房地产投资信托和公司法人已得到广泛研究。但是,对酒店业中各种组织形式的研究在一定程度上是有限的。这项研究试图通过比较1993年至2011年上市酒店REIT和C公司的股票市场表现来弥补这一差距。此外,重大事件(如并购和立法修正案)对公司股价的影响观测到的。最后,对进行公司重组的公司进行了详细的案例研究。本文的研究目的是研究(a)REITs是否是住宿业的有效组织结构; (b)房地产投资信托基金的税收优惠是否能够抵消其所面临的监管限制。该研究推断,房地产投资信托收购方在并购方面具有优势,但在所有其他情况下,房地产投资信托的净收益并不清楚。按市值计算,酒店房地产投资信托和酒店C公司的业绩几乎相同,但是如果权重相等,酒店房地产投资信托的表现要优于其C公司。此外,结果表明,房地产投资信托基金的回报极不稳定。从广义上讲,酒店业分为两个不同的部分:酒店所有权和酒店管理,所提供的经营灵活性是使REITs与C公司同行区别开的主要因素之一。因此,本研究得出的结论是,公司结构的选择很大程度上取决于公司的业务战略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号