首页> 外文OA文献 >Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods
【2h】

Are bone losers distinguishable from bone formers in a skeletal series? Implications for adult age at death assessment methods

机译:骨质丢失者是否与骨骼系列中的骨骼形成者有区别?成人年龄对死亡评估方法的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clinical studies indicate that genetic factors play a crucial role in primary osteoarthritis and osteoporosis. In addition, it has been suggested that these two diseases are inversely related. Within a population, one can find two sub-groups: the "bone formers" and the "bone losers". The changes to the joint surfaces used to assess adult age at death are related to the loss of bone substance and to bone formation (osteophytes). The modification of these indicators with age differs between bone formers and bone losers. Therefore, age-at-death assessment methods should make use of two standards, one for each sub-group. A preliminary study examining the possibility of distinguishing those who lose cortical bone from those who show signs of bony formation was conducted on a series of skeletons from Portugal, dating to the end of 19th century and the beginning of the 20th. Bone loss was evaluated using the cortical index (CI) of the second metacarpal on X-rays. The presence of osteophytes on dry bones was assessed macroscopically.
机译:临床研究表明,遗传因素在原发性骨关节炎和骨质疏松症中起关键作用。另外,已经提出这两种疾病是负相关的。在一个人口中,可以找到两个亚组:“骨形成者”和“骨丧失者”。用于评估成年死亡年龄的关节表面的变化与骨质流失和骨形成(骨赘)有关。这些指标随年龄的变化在骨形成者和骨丢失者之间是不同的。因此,死亡年龄评估方法应使用两个标准,每个子组一个。一项始于19世纪末至20世纪初的初步研究探讨了区分那些失去皮质骨的人和那些表现出骨形成迹象的人的可能性。使用X射线第二掌骨的皮质指数(CI)评估骨丢失。肉眼观察干燥骨上骨赘的存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号