首页> 外文OA文献 >Eating to save wild-life: is a truly conservation-minded zoo/aquarium a vegan zoo/aquarium?
【2h】

Eating to save wild-life: is a truly conservation-minded zoo/aquarium a vegan zoo/aquarium?

机译:吃拯救野生生物:是一个真正具有保护意识的动物园/水族馆,素食动物园/水族馆?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

According to the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria their mission is ‘to facilitate cooperation … towards the goals of education, research and conservation’. Livestock production is one of the leading causes of often-irreversible land use changes, greenhouse gas emissions, loss of biodiversity and different types of environmental degradation – all affecting wildlife negatively, and hence undermining conservation policies that aim to protect individuals, populations and species. But what is the link between livestock production and zoos and aquariums? One link, putting it a bit boldly, could be: Does it make sense to work for conservation by preserving animal species in captivity while selling food to visitors that may be undermining this effort? Complicating the issue is that zoos and aquariums are dependent on generating a profit from ‘non-core’ services such as cafeterias and the like to generate funds for running the zoo, and conceivably, in turn for conservation purposes – funds that might diminish if zoos and aquariums do not sell a variety of food products, including animal-based ones to their visitors. The main question addressed by this paper is: If zoos and aquariums are to work for sustainability and species conservation – should food served in zoos be part of considerations – and to what extent? To answer this question the paper presents the goals of EAZA along with environmental impact profiles, relying on previously published life cycle assessments of the entirety (i.e. from cradle to gate) and across a multitude of impact categories (i.e. including and beyond climate change), of typical food items sold in zoos and aquariums. It describes the impacts on wildlife and nature that these products may have. Further we link this analysis to different ideas of sustainability, addressing the issue of how to balance positive and negative impacts of zoos and aquariums. Finally we discuss the educational opportunities that arise if food served in zoos and aquariums is seen as part of a conservation strategy – and the possible challenges such an approach faces.
机译:根据欧洲动物园和水族馆协会的说法,他们的任务是“促进合作……朝着教育,研究和保护的目标迈进”。畜牧生产是经常发生不可逆转的土地利用变化,温室气体排放,生物多样性丧失和不同类型的环境退化的主要原因之一,所有这些都对野生生物造成负面影响,因此破坏了旨在保护个人,种群和物种的保护政策。但是,畜牧生产与动物园和水族馆之间有什么联系?一个大胆地说来的链接可能是:为动物保育工作是否有意义,那就是将动物物种圈养起来,同时向可能会破坏这一努力的游客出售食物?使问题复杂化的是,动物园和水族馆依赖于从自助餐厅等“非核心”服务中获利来产生资金来运营动物园,并且可以想像的是,出于保护目的,如果动物园成立,资金可能会减少水族馆不向游客出售各种食品,包括动物性食品。本文要解决的主要问题是:如果动物园和水族馆要为实现可持续发展和物种保护而努力–动物园提供的食物是否应纳入考虑范围–程度如何?为了回答这个问题,本文提出了EAZA的目标以及环境影响概况,它依赖于先前发布的整个生命周期评估(即从摇篮到大门)以及多种影响类别(即包括和不包括气候变化),在动物园和水族馆中出售的典型食品的种类。它描述了这些产品可能对野生动植物和自然产生的影响。此外,我们将此分析与可持续性的不同观点联系起来,解决了如何平衡动物园和水族馆的正面和负面影响的问题。最后,我们讨论了如果将在动物园和水族馆中提供的食物视为一项保护战略的一部分所产生的教育机会,以及这种方法可能面临的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号