首页> 外文OA文献 >Integration of Space Heating and Hot Water Supply in Low Temperature District Heating
【2h】

Integration of Space Heating and Hot Water Supply in Low Temperature District Heating

机译:低温区域供热中空间供暖与热水供应的整合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

District heating makes it possible to provide heat for many consumers in an efficient manner. In particular, district heating based on combined heat and power production is highly efficient. One disadvantage of district heating is that there is a significant heat loss from the pipes to the surrounding ground. In larger networks involving both transmission and distribution systems, the heat loss is most significant from the distribution network. An estimate is that about 80-90 % of the heat loss occurs in the distribution system. In addition, the heat loss is naturally highest from the forward pipes, where the water is at the highest temperature. The heat loss may be lowered by decreasing the temperatures in the network for which reason low temperature networks are proposed as a low loss solution for future district heating. However, the heating demand of the consumers involve both domestic hot water and space heating. Space heating may be provided at low temperature in modern low energy buildings. Domestic hot water, however, needs to reach sufficient temperatures to avoid growth of legionella bacteria. If the network temperature is below the temperature demand, supplementary heating is required by the consumer. In the present paper we study conventional district heating at different temperature levels and compare the energy efficiency, the exergetic efficiency and annual heating cost to solutions that utilize electricity for supplementary heating of domestic hot water in low temperature district heating. Four different supplementary heating solutions are studied: direct electric heating and three heat pump solutions. Heat pumps with R134a and R744 are studied. The results show that conventional solutions at lowest possible temperature have the highest exergetic efficiency of 28 % and lowest annual cost of C 690 (5200 DKK) for a 159 m2 house. The best low temperature system is an R134a heat pump with hot water storage on the district heating side. This system reaches an exergetic efficiency of 25 % with a heat pump COP of 4.0.
机译:区域供热可以有效地为许多消费者提供热量。特别是,基于热电联产的区域供热非常高效。区域供热的一个缺点是从管道到周围地面的热量损失很大。在同时涉及输电和配电系统的大型网络中,配电网络的热量损失最为明显。据估计,大约80-90%的热损失发生在配电系统中。另外,自然水从最高温度的前管中流失的热量自然最高。可以通过降低网络中的温度来降低热损失,因此提出了将低温网络作为未来区域供热的低损耗解决方案。然而,消费者的供暖需求涉及生活热水和空间供暖。在现代低能耗建筑中,可以在低温下提供空间供暖。但是,生活热水需要达到足够的温度,以避免军团菌繁殖。如果网络温度低于温度需求,则用户需要补充加热。在本文中,我们研究了在不同温度水平下的常规区域供热,并比较了在低温区域供热中利用电补充生活热水的解决方案的能源效率,能源效率和年度供暖成本。研究了四种不同的辅助加热解决方案:直接电加热和三种热泵解决方案。研究了带有R134a和R744的热泵。结果表明,在可能的最低温度下,常规解决方案的最高能源效率为28%,对于159平方米的房屋,年成本最低为C 690(5200 DKK)。最好的低温系统是R134a热泵,在区域供热侧装有热水。当热泵COP为4.0时,该系统的能源效率达到25%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号