首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of different modeling approaches to simulate contaminant transport in a fractured limestone aquifer
【2h】

Comparison of different modeling approaches to simulate contaminant transport in a fractured limestone aquifer

机译:模拟裂缝性石灰岩含水层中污染物运移的不同建模方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is important to understand the fate and transport of contaminants in limestone aquifers because they are a major drinking water resource. This is challenging because they are highly heterogeneous; with micro-porous grains, flint inclusions, and being heavily fractured. Several modeling approaches have been developed to describe contaminant transport in fractured media, such as the discrete fracture (with various fracture geometries), equivalent porous media (with and without anisotropy), and dual porosity models. However, these modeling concepts are not well tested for limestone geologies. Given available field data and model purpose, this paper therefore aims to develop, examine and compare modeling approaches for transport of contaminants in fractured limestone aquifers. The model comparison was conducted for a contaminated site in Denmark, where a plume of a dissolved contaminant (PCE) has migrated through a fractured limestone aquifer. Multilevel monitoring wells have been installed at the site and available data includes information on spill history, extent of contamination, geology and hydrogeology. To describe the geology and fracture network, data from borehole logs was combined with an analysis of heterogeneities and fractures from a nearby excavation (analog site). Methods for translating the geological information and fracture mapping into each of the model concepts were examined. Each model was compared with available field data, considering both model fit and measures of model suitability. An analysis of model parameter identifiability and sensitivity is presented. Results show that there is considerable difference between modeling approaches, and that it is important to identify the right one for the actual scale and model purpose. A challenge in the use of field data is the determination of relevant hydraulic properties and interpretation of aqueous and solid phase contaminant concentration sampling data. Traditional water sampling has a bias towards fracture sampling, however concentrations in the limestone matrix are needed for assessing contaminant rebound. The comparison with data showed how much information is required to discriminate between models, and recommendations on how to identify the best modeling approach are presented.
机译:重要的是要了解石灰石含水层中污染物的去向和传输,因为它们是主要的饮用水资源。这是具有挑战性的,因为它们高度异构。带有微孔晶粒,fl石夹杂物,并且严重断裂。已经开发了几种建模方法来描述污染物在裂缝介质中的传输,例如离散裂缝(具有各种裂缝几何形状),等效多孔介质(具有和不具有各向异性)和双重孔隙度模型。但是,这些建模概念尚未针对石灰岩地质进行良好测试。在给定可用的现场数据和模型目的的情况下,本文旨在开发,检查和比较在破碎的石灰岩含水层中污染物迁移的建模方法。模型比较是在丹麦的一个受污染场地进行的,在那里,一股溶解的污染物(PCE)羽流已通过裂缝的石灰岩含水层迁移。该现场已安装了多级监测井,可用数据包括有关溢油历史,污染程度,地质和水文地质的信息。为了描述地质和裂缝网络,将井眼测井数据与附近开挖(模拟站点)的非均质性和裂缝分析相结合。研究了将地质信息和裂缝图转换为每个模型概念的方法。考虑模型拟合和模型适用性的度量,将每个模型与可用的现场数据进行比较。对模型参数的可识别性和敏感性进行了分析。结果表明,建模方法之间存在很大差异,对于实际规模和模型目的,确定正确的方法非常重要。使用现场数据的一个挑战是确定相关的水力特性以及解释水相和固相污染物浓度采样数据。传统的水采样偏向于裂缝采样,但是需要使用石灰石基质中的浓度来评估污染物的反弹。与数据的比较表明,区分模型需要多少信息,并提出了有关如何识别最佳建模方法的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号