首页> 外文OA文献 >Prospect risk, pot odds and efficient drill or no-drill decision making: what the exploration business can learn from high stakes poker
【2h】

Prospect risk, pot odds and efficient drill or no-drill decision making: what the exploration business can learn from high stakes poker

机译:潜在风险,底池赔率和高效钻探或无钻决策:勘探业务可以从高风险扑克中学到什么

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A decision to proceed with risk ventures, such as exploration wells, requires three basic estimates: the cost, if the venture fails; the reward, if the venture succeeds; and the chance of success (risk). These three estimates are combined to derive the Expected Value and Expected Rate of Return, which are important inputs to go/no-go decisions. However, while cost and reward are seen as relatively “hard” numbers, based on measurable quantities and established price forecasts, risk is commonly seen as a “soft” number, an opinion based on incomplete knowledge. Decisions may be deferred, seeking more constraint on the risk estimate; this delay can be counterproductive. An alternative approach is used by professional poker players to make an equivalent decision. In that business, too, the chance of winning is harder to constrain than the cost and reward. Instead of seeking to fine-tune the risk, players compare a rough estimate of chance against “Pot Odds”, an easily-calculated number (the chance of winning needed to break even), and use this comparison to make the right decision efficiently.ududThis approach can also be used in the exploration business. Pot Odds of a prospect can be calculated using expected dry hole costs and the predicted value of a discovery. comparison with the estimated chance of success may indicate whether we already have enough information to make the appropriate decision, or whether further work is justified. This may improve business decision making efficiency or provide a sense check on decisions already made.
机译:进行诸如勘探井之类的风险投资的决定需要三个基本的估计:成本(如果投资失败);如果企业成功,则给予奖励;和成功的机会(风险)。这三个估计值相结合得出了期望值和期望回报率,这是进行/不通过决策的重要输入。但是,虽然成本和报酬被视为相对的“硬”数字,基于可测量的数量和既定的价格预测,但风险通常被视为“软”数字,这是基于不完全知识的观点。可以推迟决策,以寻求对风险估计的更多约束;这种延迟可能适得其反。专业扑克玩家使用另一种方法来做出相同的决定。在该业务中,获胜的机会也比成本和报酬更难控制。玩家没有寻求微调风险,而是将机会的大概估计与“赔率”(一个容易计算的数字(获胜的机会需要达到收支平衡))进行比较,并使用此比较有效地做出正确的决定。 ud ud这种方法也可用于勘探业务。可以使用预期的干井成本和发现的预测值来计算潜在客户的赔率。与估计的成功机会进行比较可能表明我们是否已经有足够的信息来做出适当的决定,或者是否有理由进行进一步的工作。这可以提高业务决策的效率或对已经做出的决策进行合理的检查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peel Frank J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号