首页> 外文OA文献 >Waterless fines removal : technical feasibility of using air classification to separate fines from sand and gravel
【2h】

Waterless fines removal : technical feasibility of using air classification to separate fines from sand and gravel

机译:无水细粉去除:使用空气分类将细粒与砂和砾石分开的技术可行性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Washing plants are commonly used by sand and gravel operations to produce clean aggregate;udthey are effective in removing fines (silt and clay) but use a large volume of water. Newudregulations controlling the abstraction of water require quarry operators to demonstrate ‘waterudefficient’ practice as part of the abstraction license renewal process. The use of waterlessudtechnologies for removing fines would go a long way to satisfying this requirement; airudclassification is one such technology. This report details the findings of air classification trialsudcarried out to determine the technical feasibility of using a waterless method for producing cleanudaggregate. This work forms part of the ‘Waterless Fines Removal’ project funded by theudAggregate Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF).udFour samples of sand were collected from sand and gravel operations (these will remainudanonymous) for laboratory and pilot-scale air classification trials. The laboratory-scale trialsudwere carried out using a Hosokawa Alpine zig-zag air classifier and the pilot-scale trials using audBradley Pulverizer Windsifter.udThe proportion of fines removed by air classification from two of the sites was poor, rangingudfrom 12% to 29% (average of 18%); the main factor causing the lower fines removal figures wasudinsufficient disaggregation of fines during the separation. This highlights one of the advantagesudof using wet processes; the fines are fully dispersed before separation and they are easier toudremove. The other two sites had fines removals ranging from 33% to 84% (average of 58%); thisudis comparable with the fines removal achieved by air classifiers used in other parts of the world.udThere are apparently no recorded cases of quarries in the UK using air classifiers as part of theudfine aggregate production process. There are a few quarries across the world, mainly in dry partsudof the USA, where air classifiers are used to produce manufactured sand; in these cases finesudremoval is typically 50 to 65%.udIn the future, it is possible that crushed rock quarries may adopt air classification to processudquarry fines (material finer than 4mm); this would be especially attractive to limestoneudoperations for production of a saleable fine aggregate and a fine-grained by-product (whichudcould find use as agricultural lime or as mineral filler). It seems unlikely that air classificationudwill be adopted by UK sand and gravel operations in the near future; however given the pressureudon water resources and technological improvements it may be adopted in the longer term.
机译:沙子和碎石操作通常使用洗涤设备来生产干净的骨料; 虽然它们可以有效去除细粉(淤泥和粘土),但要使用大量的水。控制取水的新放松法规要求采石场经营者在取水许可续期过程中展示“节水/省水”的做法。使用无水超声波技术清除罚款将大大满足这一要求;空气分类法就是这样一种技术。本报告详细介绍了进行空气分类试验的结果,以确定使用无水方法生产清洁/集料的技术可行性。这项工作是由 udAg征收可持续性基金(ALSF)资助的“无水罚款清除”项目的一部分。 ud从沙子和砾石运营中收集了四个沙子样本(这些样本将仍然 udanonymous)用于实验室和中试规模的空气分类试验。实验室规模的试验是使用Hosokawa Alpine曲折形空气分级机进行的,试验规模的试验是使用a udBradley粉碎机风筛机进行的。 ud通过空气分级从两个站点中去除的细粉比例很差,范围为 udud从12%提高到29%(平均18%);导致较低的粉尘清除率的主要因素是分离过程中粉尘的分解不足。这凸显了使用湿法工艺的优势之一。细粉在分离前已完全分散,更容易去除。另外两个地点的罚款清除率为33%至84%(平均为58%);这与世界其他地区使用的空气分级机所实现的罚款清除率相当。 ud英国显然没有使用空气分级机作为 udfine骨料生产过程的一部分的采石场。世界上有一些采石场,主要是在美国的干旱地区 ud,那里的空气分级机用于生产人造沙。在这种情况下,细度 ud去除率通常为50%至65%。 ud将来,碎石采石场可能会采用空气分级来处理细度石英粉(材料细度小于4mm);这对于生产可销售的细骨料和细粒副产品(可以用作农用石灰或矿物填料)的石灰石/作业特别有吸引力。在不久的将来,英国的沙子和砾石作业似乎不太可能采用空气分类法。但是,鉴于乌冬水资源和技术进步的压力,它可能会在较长时期内被采用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wagner D.; Mitchell C.J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号