首页> 外文OA文献 >Democratising print? The field and practices ofudradical and community printshops in Britain 1968-98
【2h】

Democratising print? The field and practices ofudradical and community printshops in Britain 1968-98

机译:民主化打印? ud的领域和实践英国1968 - 98年的激进和社区版画

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Alternative media studies is a rapidly expanding field, particularly since the emergence and uptake of digital technologies and their potential to facilitate the articulation of alternative and contestatory voices. As previous scholarship has shown, aspirations to this end, deploying various communication technologies are not new. However the histories of these earlier activities can be elusive. This thesis examines one such case, typically absent from litanies of pre-digital attempts in democratising media/cultural production; Britain’s late 20th century radical and community printshops, particularly but not exclusively those in London. Field theory approaches (Bourdieu 1994, Crossley 2006, Fligstein & McAdam 2012) are used to map and analyse the trajectory of this heterogeneous field of printshops; from its emergence in the 1970s to its dissipation by the 1990s. The thesis identifies the combinations of material, cultural and political conditions, internal and external to their fields of operation (fields of movement and civil society activity), that variously enabled and challenged their growth and survival. The field approach is linked with Shove et al.’s (2012) synthesised practice theory to analyse how the printshops democratised internal organisation and production, and the challenges in doing so.udThe methods undertaken to conduct the study are a combination of archival research, the instigation of a ‘radical printshops’ open wiki and 55 in-depth interviews with printshop members. The research demonstrates how the printshops activities did not exist in isolation but as part of, and dependent upon, wider webs of culture, politics and influence. It shows how their participatory practices were contingent on wider field recognition of their value, and how ‘habitus’ can play a role in their uptake. The research also found that the heterogeneity of printshop memberships kept them open to diverse movement struggles and internal selfcriticism, but how this could also be a source of internal instability and conflicts about aims. Lastly, the thesis reveals how the influence of the alternative left field on municipal socialist policy of the 1980s both enabled and undermined the activity of the printshops. Generally the thesis contributes to alternative media studies by bringing the printshops to attention and connecting them into a larger history of democratic experiments in the amplification of contestatory ideas and marginalised voices.
机译:替代媒体研究是一个快速发展的领域,特别是由于数字技术的出现和采用及其在促进表达替代性和竞争性声音方面的潜力。如先前的奖学金所示,为此目的的愿望,部署各种通信技术并不是什么新鲜事。但是,这些早期活动的历史可能难以捉摸。本文研究了一个这样的案例,通常在数字化媒体/文化生产民主化前的数字尝试中没有这种案例。英国20世纪晚期的激进和社区印刷厂,特别是但不仅限于伦敦的印刷厂。场论方法(Bourdieu 1994,Crossley 2006,Fligstein&McAdam 2012)被用来绘制和分析这种不同种类印刷场的轨迹。从1970年代的出现到1990年代的消失。本论文确定了物质,文化和政治条件的组合,这些组合在其工作领域(运动领域和公民社会活动领域)的内部和外部,这些组合各种条件使它们的成长和生存受到挑战。实地研究方法与Shove等人(2012)的综合实践理论相联系,以分析印刷厂如何使内部组织和生产民主化,以及这样做的挑战。 ud进行研究的方法是档案研究的结合,煽动“激进的印刷厂”开放式Wiki和对印刷厂成员进行55次深入采访。该研究表明,印刷厂的活动不是孤立地存在,而是作为更广泛的文化,政治和影响网络的一部分并依赖于此。它显示了他们的参与方式如何取决于更广泛的领域对其价值的认识,以及“习性”如何在他们的接受中发挥作用。研究还发现,印刷厂成员的异质性使他们容易受到各种运动斗争和内部自我批评的影响,但是这也可能成为内部不稳定和目标冲突的根源。最后,论文揭示了替代左领域对1980年代市政社会主义政策的影响如何既使印刷厂的活动又受到破坏。总体而言,论文通过引起印刷厂的注意并使他们进入更大的民主实验史中,从而扩大了竞争性观念和边缘化声音,从而为替代媒体研究做出了贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baines Jessica;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号