首页> 外文OA文献 >Social entrepreneurs as network orchestrators: how and why do social entrepreneurs build up and leverage social networks to perform?
【2h】

Social entrepreneurs as network orchestrators: how and why do social entrepreneurs build up and leverage social networks to perform?

机译:作为网络协调者的社会企业家:社会企业家如何以及为什么建立并利用社交网络来执行?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the last decades, extensive research about the role of networks in venture creation and development in both the sociology- (e.g.,Burt, 2005; Chiesi, 2007) and management- literature (e.g., Hoang & Antoncic, 2003; Maurer & Ebers, 2006) has been produced. However, while social networks have been recognized as crucial elements for the growth of social ventures (e.g., Bradach, 2010; Waitzer & Paul, 2011),udthere has been identified a lack of theory-motivated papers on how and why the different dimensions and configurations of social networks influence (social) venture performance over time (Aldrich & Kim,2007; Dacin et al., 2010). Filling this gap, this thesis focuses on the dynamic networking patterns of social ventures over theudorganizational lifecycle. It consists of three major parts: one conceptual paper, and two empirical papers. Drawing from networks-, social capital-, and organizational ecology-approaches (e.g., Hannan & Freeman, 1989; Kim et al., 2006), in the conceptual paper I develop a four-stage typology of network development, contending that selective boundary-spanning can lead to better performance outcomes if aligned with time-contingencies. The second paper, a comparative case study of six social ventures operating in Kenya’s low income context (a setting neglected by management research), uses a qualitative approach to examine how these ventures orchestrated networks. Via the comparison of success-, failure-, and turnaround- cases, I find four core ‘stages’, and identify key characteristics of the respective networks, as well as conditions and mechanisms that help the transition from stage to stage. Having established the importance of social capital and its relation with organizational outcomes, the third paper focuses on the antecedents of social capital. A longitudinal case study in the South African low-income context shows that approaches such as bricolage can be effective in enfranchising the previously disenfranchised on a broader scale.
机译:在过去的几十年中,有关网络在社会学(例如Burt,2005; Chiesi,2007)和管理文献(例如Hoang&Antoncic,2003; Maurer&Ebers, 2006)已制作。然而,尽管社交网络已被认为是社交企业发展的关键要素(例如,Bradach,2010年; Waitzer和Paul,2011年),但人们发现,缺乏关于不同维度如何以及为何如此的理论性论文社交网络的配置和配置会随着时间的推移影响(社会)风险投资绩效(Aldrich&Kim,2007; Dacin等,2010)。填补这一空白,本文着重研究了企业在整个组织生命周期内的动态网络模式。它由三个主要部分组成:一份概念文件和两份经验论文。借鉴网络,社会资本和组织生态学的方法(例如,Hannan&Freeman,1989; Kim等,2006),在概念文件中,我提出了网络发展的四个阶段类型学,主张选择边界如果与时间紧迫性保持一致,则跨度可以带来更好的性能结果。第二篇论文是对在肯尼亚低收入环境(被管理研究忽略的环境)中运营的六家社会企业进行比较的案例研究,该研究使用定性方法研究了这些企业如何组织网络。通过比较成功案例,失败案例和周转案例,我发现了四个核心“阶段”,并确定了各个网络的关键特征,以及有助于从一个阶段过渡到另一个阶段的条件和机制。在确立了社会资本的重要性及其与组织成果的关系之后,第三篇论文集中于社会资本的前身。在南非低收入背景下进行的纵向案例研究表明,诸如贿赂之类的方法可以有效地使以前被剥夺权利的人在更大范围内获得特许权。

著录项

  • 作者

    Busch Christian;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号