首页> 外文OA文献 >One size fits all? Designer-institutions: Lessons from two flawed attempts in Malawi
【2h】

One size fits all? Designer-institutions: Lessons from two flawed attempts in Malawi

机译:一种尺寸适合所有人?设计师 - 机构:马拉维两次有缺陷的尝试的教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article observes two examples of attempted institutional design in Malawi's central region, Kasungu. In both cases external development actors enter local communities, and establish infrastructure to exploit two common sources of water. One is the exploitation of a river for group irrigation, the other a borehole to facilitate appropriation from a source of ground water. In both cases the infrastructure is accompanied by elaborate schemes of governance, ignoring the pre-existing social and bio-physical traits of the area. The results are two non-robust systems, collapsing under the weight of latent conflicts fuelled by the areas pre-existing institutional and bio-physical configuration. Using the framework of robustness in Social-Ecological Systems as a practical-analytical tool, the entities of the two systems are identified and their failure illustrated. The particular lessons drawn from the two cases are transformed into five general points meant to stimulate both development practitioners and future research endeavors.
机译:本文观察了马拉维中部地区Kasungu尝试进行机构设计的两个示例。在这两种情况下,外部发展参与者进入当地社区,并建立基础设施以开发两种常见的水源。一种是利用河流进行集体灌溉,另一种是利用钻孔从地下水源中挪用土地。在这两种情况下,基础设施都伴随着精心设计的治理计划,而忽略了该地区先前存在的社会和生物物理特征。结果是两个不稳固的系统,在先前存在的制度和生物物理结构的地区所加剧的潜在冲突的压制下崩溃了。使用社会生态系统中的稳健性框架作为一种实用分析工具,可以识别这两个系统的实体并说明其故障。从这两个案例中汲取的特殊经验教训被转化为五个总体要点,旨在激发开发实践者和未来的研究努力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Skjølsvold, Tomas Moe;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号