首页> 外文OA文献 >A study of an integrated approach for strategy formulation and performance measurement in manufacturing enterprises
【2h】

A study of an integrated approach for strategy formulation and performance measurement in manufacturing enterprises

机译:制造企业战略制定和绩效评估综合方法研究

摘要

Performance measurement quantifies the efficiency and effectiveness of action that helps organisations translate their strategies into results and fixes accountability to improve performance. This research identifies two problem statements: First, can integrating strategy formulation with measurement initiatives safeguard the performance goals in manufacturing enterprises? And second, how can manufacturing enterprises derive an integrated approach that meet their requirements and needs for strategy formulation (SF) and performance measurement (PM) system implementation? This work proposes an integrated paradigm that aligns the strategy-related performance measures to attain performance improvement in manufacturing enterprises. A two-stage empirical study was conducted, with 232 Hong Kong firms and 85 Shanghai firms participating in the study. The first stage surveys identified the common success factors, problem areas and strategy choices, and examined the relationship amongst corporate, marketing, technology and operational strengths and the 'reactive/proactive' strategy choices. The subsequent personal interviews in Hong Kong complemented the survey findings by examining the impact of SF/PM efforts in manufacturing enterprises. There were two series of interviews. The first series acquired the managerial views on the decision criteria on the integration of strategy formulation and performance measures, with the aid of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology. The second interview series derived several design elements and process considerations for aligning strategy formulation with performance measures. The empirical study used in this research provided important inputs and served as a foundation for development of a SF/PM Integration (SPI) model. In an attempt to integrate strategy formulation and performance measurement, the SPI model adopts the guiding principles embodied with the Business Excellence Models and stresses the results-oriented assessments on five categories of SF/PM criteria, namely leadership and constancy of purpose, management by process, people development, continuous improvement, and results orientation. Unlike that of the MBNQA and EQA, the point values for criteria and sub-elements of SPI model were generated collectively from the perspectives of industry practitioners in the manufacturing sectors. These were determined using the normalised weights obtained from the AHP analysis of empirical interview findings. They are taken together to calculate the overall performance index for an organisation. The process framework comprises five stages starting from strategy formulation to implementation and evaluation of an integrated performance measurement system. It encapsulates the requirements, critical processes and activities of strategy formulation and performance measures into the way they are being managed in organisations. The SPI model helps manufacturing enterprises to build a self-assessment platform for amalgamating strategies, plans and actions which can enable performance improvement. It can supplement any Business Excellence Models, and serves three important purposes. Firstly, it is a working tool for integrating SF and PM initiatives and guiding the implementation of performance measurement system in manufacturing enterprises. Secondly, using the model can help improve the effectiveness of management practices in relation to performance measures and self-assessment; and thirdly, using the model can facilitate information sharing of best practices within an organisation and benchmark performance against competitors and other organisations. Results of a post-evaluation survey affirmed that the model and processes could encourage organisational learning and provide a practical means for manufacturing enterprises to devise effective self-assessment and performance improvement. The novel contributions of the research are to identify the key SF/PM attributes, develop the self-assessment scoring method and the process framework accompanying the SPI model. Manufacturing enterprises must evolve a holistic performance measurement system matching their corporate mission, objectives and strategies. The SPI model provides them with a systems approach for building and integrating the capabilities of SF and PM to attain performance improvement goals, irrespective of their business nature and sizes.
机译:绩效评估量化了行动的效率和效力,这些行动可帮助组织将其战略转化为结果并确定问责制以提高绩效。这项研究确定了两个问题陈述:首先,将战略制定与测量计划相结合是否可以维护制造企业的绩效目标?其次,制造企业如何才能获得一种能够满足其战略制定(SF)和绩效衡量(PM)系统实施要求和需求的集成方法?这项工作提出了一个集成的范式,该范式使与战略相关的绩效指标保持一致,以实现制造企业的绩效改善。进行了一个分为两个阶段的实证研究,共有232家香港公司和85家上海公司参与了研究。第一阶段的调查确定了常见的成功因素,问题领域和策略选择,并研究了公司,营销,技术和运营实力与“主动/主动”策略选择之间的关系。随后在香港进行的个人访谈通过检查科幻/ PM努力对制造企业的影响,补充了调查结果。有两个系列的采访。第一个系列借助于层次分析法(AHP)获得了有关战略制定和绩效指标整合决策标准的管理观点。第二个采访系列得出了一些使策略制定与绩效指标保持一致的设计要素和过程注意事项。本研究中使用的经验研究提供了重要的投入,并为开发SF / PM集成(SPI)模型奠定了基础。为了整合策略制定和绩效评估,SPI模型采用业务卓越模型中包含的指导原则,并强调对SF / PM标准的五类进行结果导向的评估,即领导力和持续性,按过程进行管理,人员发展,持续改进和成果导向。与MBNQA和EQA不同,SPI模型的标准和子元素的点值是从制造业的行业从业人员的角度共同生成的。这些是使用从经验访谈结果的AHP分析获得的归一化权重确定的。将它们结合起来以计算组织的总体绩效指标。该过程框架包括五个阶段,从战略制定到集成绩效评估系统的实施和评估。它把需求,关键流程和战略制定活动以及绩效指标封装到组织中进行管理。 SPI模型可帮助制造企业建立自我评估平台,以整合战略,计划和行动,从而提高绩效。它可以补充任何业务卓越模型,并具有三个重要目的。首先,它是整合SF和PM计划并指导制造企业绩效评估系统实施的工具。其次,使用该模型可以帮助提高与绩效指标和自我评估相关的管理实践的有效性;第三,使用该模型可以促进组织内最佳实践的信息共享,并根据竞争对手和其他组织对绩效进行基准测试。评估后调查的结果证实,该模型和过程可以鼓励组织学习,并为制造企业制定有效的自我评估和绩效改进提供实用手段。该研究的新颖贡献在于识别关键的SF / PM属性,开发自我评估评分方法以及SPI模型随附的过程框架。制造企业必须发展与其公司使命,目标和策略相匹配的整体绩效评估系统。 SPI模型为他们提供了一种系统方法,用于构建和集成SF和PM的功能,以实现性能改进目标,而不管其业务性质和规模如何。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pun Kit Fai;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号