首页> 外文OA文献 >Bank lending to the production sector: credit crunch or extra-credit?
【2h】

Bank lending to the production sector: credit crunch or extra-credit?

机译:银行对生产部门的贷款:信贷紧缩还是额外信贷?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper provides empirical evidence to support the theory that, in Italy, over the course of the past two years, even though a considerable slowdown in bank lending has been recorded, there has not been a credit crunch. After a first section dedicated to a descriptive analysis of the data, the paper presents an econometric estimation of the production sector’s demand for bank loans. An Error Correction Model (ECM) is used – estimated for the pre-crisis period (1998.Q2 – 2007.Q2) and applied both with the one and two step procedure – which considers lending as a function of the added value of the private sector, of the gross operating margin to nominal added value ratio (a proxy for self-financing) and of the real interest rate applied to loans. To test the robustness of the results obtained in the first specification of the model, we remove the assumption of weak exogeneity of the independent variables of the single equation model and construct a multivariate multi-equation model (VECM). All of the different approaches and methods adopted provided similar results: as expected, the demand for credit increases as real added value increases and decreases as the cost of lending and self-financing increase. The dynamic out-of-sample forecast of the model, relating to the two-year period of economic and financial crisis (2007.Q3 – 2009.Q2), shows that the actual loan stock remained well above the “theoretical” level forecasted on the basis of the functional relationships estimated before the crisis. This delta (which can be defined as “extra-credit”) is interpreted as the outcome of a rightward shift of the credit supply curve, rather than a leftward shift as would have happened in a credit crunch scenario.
机译:本文提供了经验证据来支持这一理论,即意大利在过去两年中,尽管已记录了银行贷款的显着放缓,但并未出现信贷紧缩的情况。在第一部分致力于数据的描述性分析之后,本文提出了对生产部门对银行贷款需求的计量经济学估算。使用错误校正模型(ECM)–在危机前时期(1998.Q2 – 2007.Q2)进行估算,并通过一步骤和两步骤程序进行应用–该步骤将贷款视作私人部门增加值的函数部门的总营业利润率与名义增加值之比(代表自筹资金)以及适用于贷款的实际利率。为了测试在模型的第一个规范中获得的结果的鲁棒性,我们删除了单方程模型的独立变量的弱外生性假设,并构建了多元多方程模型(VECM)。所采用的所有不同方法和方法均提供相似的结果:正如预期的那样,信贷需求随着实际增加值的增加而增加,而随着借贷和自筹资金的成本的增加而减少。该模型的动态样本外预测与经济和金融危机的两年期(2007.Q3 – 2009.Q2)有关,表明实际贷款存量仍远高于预测的“理论”水平危机之前估计的功能关系的基础。该增量(可以定义为“额外信贷”)被解释为信贷供给曲线向右移动的结果,而不是信贷紧缩情况下向左移动的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Di Giulio Daniele;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号