首页> 外文OA文献 >Forest-floor treatments in Arizona ponderosa pine restoration ecosystems: No short-term effects on plant communities
【2h】

Forest-floor treatments in Arizona ponderosa pine restoration ecosystems: No short-term effects on plant communities

机译:亚利桑那州黄松松树恢复生态系统的森林地面处理:对植物群落没有短期影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Leaf litter accumulation during fire exclusion and increases in tree density in postsettlement southwestern Pinus ponderosa forests may limit the establishment of understory vegetation. We performed an experiment in P. ponderosa forests of northern Arizona to ascertain plant community responses to forest-floor scarification and Oi removal on thirty-six 100-m2 plots overlaid on an existing ecological restoration experiment that involved tree thinning and prescribed burning. Constrasting with findings from many other forest types, forest-floor treatments had no effect on community diversity or composition during the 2-year experiment. Sørensen similarities were as high as 97% between posttreatment years within treatments; and successional vectors also provided little indication that treatments may appreciably affect longer-term successional trajectories. Lack of response to these fairly drastic treatments is surprising given these forests’ exceptionally heavy Oi horizons and large proportions of conifer litter. Apparently shading, belowground competition for water or nutrients, or other tree-associated factors more strongly limit understory communities than does leaf litter. Based on sparse A-horizon seed banks averaging⋅ m–2 and limited above ground vegetation, we hypothesize that seed shortages, particularly for native perennials, also partly precluded a treatment response. Because extensive unvegetated areas at these restoration sites may be colonized by exotics, conservative management strategies could include testing the seeding or outplanting of desirable native species as an option for filling unoccupied microsites. Reporting of “no treatment effect” experiments such as this one is important to avoid biasing meta-analyses, as is future research to clarify combinations of factors limiting understory communities. Increased understanding of these limiting factors may lead to identification of other treatments that promote recovery of native species during ecological restoration in this region.
机译:西南偏黄松森林在沉降后的除火过程中叶片凋落物的积累和树木密度的增加可能限制了林下植被的建立。我们在亚利桑那州北部的美国黄松森林中进行了一项实验,以确定植物群落对森林地板稀疏和Oi去除的反应,该实验覆盖了现有的生态恢复实验(覆盖树木稀疏和规定的焚烧),覆盖了36个100平方米的地块。与其他许多森林类型的发现相吻合的是,在为期两年的实验中,森林地面处理对群落多样性或组成没有影响。治疗后各年之间,Sørensen相似性高达97%。连续向量也没有提供迹象表明治疗可能会明显影响长期连续轨迹。鉴于这些森林异常茂盛的Oi地平线和大比例的针叶树凋落物,对这些相当激烈的处理方式缺乏反应令人惊讶。显然,遮荫,地下对水或养分的竞争,或其他与树木相关的因素比落叶落叶更能限制林下群落。基于平均水平m–2且稀疏的地上植被稀疏的水平种子种子库,我们假设种子短缺(尤其是本地多年生植物的种子短缺)也部分阻止了治疗反应。由于这些恢复地点的广阔无植被地区可能被外来物种所占据,因此保守的管理策略可能包括测试所需的本地物种的播种或外植,以作为填补无人居住的微型地点的一种选择。诸如此类的“无治疗效果”实验的报告对于避免偏倚荟萃分析非常重要,未来的研究也应弄清限制底层种群的因素组合。对这些限制因素的更多了解可能会导致确定在该地区生态恢复过程中促进本地物种恢复的其他治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号