首页> 外文OA文献 >Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided dental implant surgery
【2h】

Accuracy of virtually planned and CAD/CAM-guided dental implant surgery

机译:虚拟计划和CAD / CAM指导的牙种植体手术的准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The treatment with dental implants was introduced in the 1960s as an aid for patients who were missing teeth. Recently CAD/CAM guided surgical concepts have been launched on the market as a solution for treating single, partial or completely edentulous patients with dental implants. The mucosa based surgical templates is one of the fairly new dental implant systems on the market for treating patients. With this new technique it is crucial to thoroughly evaluate the accuracy, in order to avoid damaging sensitive anatomical structures of patients. Another factor of importance to consider, is the possibility to connect the bridge immediately onto the CAD/CAM guided placed implants. Companies could also benefit from more knowledge about accuracy in order to, i.e., further improve the instructions and the hardware to further enhance the security and usability of the systems.The general aim of this project was to evaluate the accuracy between virtually planned and actually placed dental implants using a surgical guide. Study I and III aimed to compare the deviation between the position of virtually planned implants and the position of implants placed with a CAD/CAM-guided surgical template in the mandible and maxilla. The aim of Study II was to perform virtual variation simulations on virtually planned implant placements and to compare them with corresponding results from actual surgeries, performed on human cadavers in Study I.In Study IV the aim was to evaluate the deviation between the results obtained from five different surgeons, from CAD/CAM guided implant surgery on plastic jaw models.Completely edentulous human cadavers, patients and plastic maxilla jaw models were included in Study I, III and IV. Study II utilized 3D STL files obtained from Study I.Study I and III, demonstrated a statistical significant difference between the virtually planned implant positions and the clinically placed implant positions after surgery. Study I demonstrated a statistically significant difference between mandibles and maxillae for the outcome variables, hex, apex and depth measurements, with smaller deviations for the maxilla.In Study III it was found that the patients moved during the preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans. When combining the movement factor between the virtually planned implants and actually placed implants positions, a statistical significant difference was observed for the hex and apex. If the movement factor was included, a statistical significant difference was found between the maxilla and mandible for the outcome variable angle.In Study II, the implant distributions were neither static nor normally distributed. Thus, within the limitations of this study, the definitive geometrical variations of the implants were not static, as they depend on the individual anatomy of the jaws and the ability to place the CAD/CAM-guided surgical template in the proper position. The Mann- Whitney U test showed that the definitive implant distributions in this study could not be assumed to be normally distributed.In Study IV a statistically significant difference was observed between all five surgeons for the outcome variables, apex, depth and angle. A statistically significant differencewas also found between the virtually planned implant positions and the actually placed implant positions for the outcome variables, apex, hex and depth.The mean value was smallest for the plastic jaw model study and largest for the human cadaver study, for the outcome variables, apex, hex and angle. For the depth, the smallest mean value was present in the patient study and largest in the plastic model study. However, the human cadaver study and patient study presented a larger range in deviation.Further studies have to be performed to evaluate the contributing factors of all steps involved in CAD/CAM guided surgery. In order to further improve knowledge about guided surgery accuracy, it is important to perform accuracy studies on conventional surgery in order to compare the results and, thus, provide a more secure treatment to the patients. In other words, the most important goal is to provide the most secure treatment available for the patients.
机译:牙科植入物的治疗方法于1960年代引入,以帮助缺少牙齿的患者。最近,CAD / CAM指导的外科手术概念已在市场上推出,作为治疗单颗,部分或完全缺牙的牙科植入物的解决方案。基于粘膜的手术模板是市场上用于治疗患者的相当新的牙科植入系统之一。使用这种新技术,至关重要的是彻底评估准确性,以避免损坏患者敏感的解剖结构。要考虑的另一个重要因素是将桥立即连接到CAD / CAM引导的植入式种植体的可能性。公司还可以从更多的准确性知识中受益,从而进一步改善指令和硬件,以进一步增强系统的安全性和可用性。该项目的总体目标是评估虚拟计划和实际部署之间的准确性。使用外科手术指导的牙科植入物。研究I和III的目的是比较虚拟计划种植体的位置与在CAD / CAM引导下的下颌骨和上颌骨手术模板放置的种植体之间的偏差。研究II的目的是对虚拟计划的植入物放置进行虚拟变异模拟,并将其与研究I中对人体尸体进行的实际手术的相应结果进行比较。研究IV的目的是评估从研究获得的结果之间的偏差来自五位不同的外科医师,来自在CAD / CAM引导下的可塑性下颌模型的植入手术。研究I,III和IV包括完全无牙的人类尸体,患者和上颌可塑性下颌模型。研究II利用了从研究I获得的3D STL文件。研究I和III显示了虚拟计划的植入物位置与手术后临床放置的植入物位置之间的统计学显着差异。研究I显示下颌骨和上颌骨在结局变量,六角形,顶点和深度测量方面有统计学上的显着差异,上颌骨的偏差较小。在研究III中,发现患者在术前和术后CBCT扫描中移动。当结合虚拟计划种植体和实际放置的种植体位置之间的运动因子时,观察到六角形和顶点的统计学显着差异。如果包括运动因子,则在结果可变角度上颌骨和下颌骨之间存在统计学差异。在研究II中,种植体分布既不是静态的也不是正态分布的。因此,在本研究的范围内,植入物的确定的几何变化不是静态的,因为它们取决于颌骨的个别解剖结构以及将CAD / CAM引导的手术模板放置在正确位置的能力。 Mann-Whitney U检验表明,不能确定本研究中确定的种植体分布为正态分布。在研究IV中,所有五名外科医生在结果变量,根尖,深度和角度方面均观察到统计学上的显着差异。在实际计划的种植体位置与实际放置的种植体位置之间,结果变量,顶点,六角形和深度也有统计学上的显着差异。塑料颚模型研究的平均值最小,而人体尸体研究的平均值最大。结果变量,顶点,六角和角度。对于深度,患者研究中的平均值最小,而塑性模型研究中的平均值最大。然而,人体尸体研究和患者研究显示出较大的偏差范围。必须进行进一步的研究以评估CAD / CAM指导手术涉及的所有步骤的影响因素。为了进一步提高有关引导手术准确性的知识,重要的是对常规手术进行准确性研究,以比较结果,从而为患者提供更安全的治疗方法。换句话说,最重要的目标是为患者提供最安全的治疗。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pettersson Andreas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号