首页> 外文OA文献 >Rigid labour compensation and flexible employment? Firm-level evidence with regard to productivity for Belgium. NBB Working Papers. No. 159, 11 March 2009
【2h】

Rigid labour compensation and flexible employment? Firm-level evidence with regard to productivity for Belgium. NBB Working Papers. No. 159, 11 March 2009

机译:刚性劳动报酬和灵活就业?关于比利时生产力的公司级证据。 NBB工作论文。第159号,2009年3月11日

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using firm-level data for Belgium over the period 1997-2005, we evaluate the elasticity of firms' labour and real average labour compensation to microeconomic total factor productivity (TFP). Our results may be summarised as follows. First, we find that the elasticity of average labour compensation to firm-level TFP is very low contrary to that of labour, consistent with real wage rigidity. Second, while the elasticity of average labour compensation to idiosyncratic firm-level TFP is close to zero, the elasticity with respect to aggregate sector-level TFP is high. We argue that average labour compensation adjustment mainly occur at the sector level through sectoral collective bargaining, which leaves little room for firm-level adjustment to firm-specific shocks. Third, we report evidence of a positive relationship between hours and idiosyncratic TFP, as well as aggregate TFP within the year.
机译:使用比利时1997年至2005年的企业级数据,我们评估了企业劳动的弹性和实际平均劳动报酬对微观经济全要素生产率(TFP)的影响。我们的结果可以总结如下。首先,我们发现,相对于劳动力,平均劳动报酬对企业级全要素生产率的弹性非常低,与实际工资刚性相一致。其次,虽然平均工资对特质企业水平全要素生产率的弹性接近于零,但相对于总部门水平全要素生产率的弹性却很高。我们认为,平均劳动报酬调整主要发生在通过部门集体谈判在部门层面上,这为企业针对特定企业的冲击进行调整提供了空间。第三,我们报告了小时数与特质TFP以及一年中的总TFP之间呈正相关的证据。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号