首页> 外文OA文献 >'Dynamics and countervailing pressures of visa, asylum and immigration policy Treaty revision: explaining change and inertia from the Amsterdam IGC to the Constitutional Treaty'
【2h】

'Dynamics and countervailing pressures of visa, asylum and immigration policy Treaty revision: explaining change and inertia from the Amsterdam IGC to the Constitutional Treaty'

机译:“签证,庇护和移民政策的动态和反补贴压力条约修订:解释阿姆斯特丹政府间委员会对宪法条约的变化和惯性”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper seeks to explain the varying, and sometimes intriguing, outcomes of the past three Treaty revisions in the area of visa, asylum and immigration. Focusing on decision rules and the institutional set-up of these policies, the results of the Amsterdam Treaty, the Treaty of Nice and the Constitutional Treaty are subjected to a (causal) analysis. The paper argues that six explanatory factors can account for the Treaty outcomes: (1) functional pressures; (2) the role of supranational institutions; (3) socialisation, deliberation and learning processes; (4) exogenous pressures; (5) the role of organised interests; and (6) countervailing forces. The framework, especially through its dialectical nature (combining both dynamics and countervailing factors), may also enable us to explain some more specific aspects of decision outcomes.
机译:本文力图解释在签证,庇护和移民领域,过去三项条约修订所产生的变化,有时甚至是令人感兴趣的结果。着眼于决策规则和这些政策的体制设置,对阿姆斯特丹条约,尼斯条约和宪法条约的结果进行(因果分析)。该论文认为,有六个解释性因素可以解释《条约》的成果:(1)功能性压力; (2)超国家机构的作用; (3)社会化,审议和学习过程; (4)外生压力; (五)有组织利益的作用; (六)反补贴力量。该框架,特别是通过其辩证性质(结合动态因素和反补贴因素),也可能使我们能够解释决策结果的某些更具体方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Niemann Arne.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号