首页> 外文OA文献 >Cardiovascular safety in refractory incontinent patients with overactive bladder receiving add-on mirabegron therapy to solifenacin (BESIDE)
【2h】

Cardiovascular safety in refractory incontinent patients with overactive bladder receiving add-on mirabegron therapy to solifenacin (BESIDE)

机译:膀胱过度活动性尿失禁患者的心血管安全性接受附加的mirabegron疗法治疗索利那新(BEsIDE)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Summary : Aims/objectives: : In the BESIDE study, combination therapy (antimuscarinic [solifenacin] and β3-adrenoceptor agonist [mirabegron]) improved efficacy over solifenacin monotherapy without exacerbating anticholinergic side effects in overactive bladder (OAB) patients; however, a potential synergistic effect on the cardiovascular (CV) system requires investigation. Methods: OAB patients remaining incontinent despite daily solifenacin 5 mg during 4-week single-blind run-in, were randomised 1:1:1 to double-blind daily combination (solifenacin 5 mg/mirabegron 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg after week 4), solifenacin 5 or 10 mg for 12 weeks. CV safety assessments included frequency of CV-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), change from baseline in vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse rate) and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. Results: The frequency of hypertension, tachycardia and ECG QT prolongation, respectively, was low and comparable across combination (1.1%, 0.3%, 0.1%), solifenacin 5 mg (0.7%, 0.1%, 0.1%), and solifenacin 10 mg groups (0.8%, 0%, 0.1%). Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline to end of treatment (EoT) in SBP, DBP, and pulse rate with combination (0.07 mm Hg [0.38], -0.35 mm Hg [0.26], 0.47 bpm [0.28]), solifenacin 5 mg (-0.93 mm Hg [0.38], -0.45 mm Hg [0.26], 0.43 bpm [0.28]) and solifenacin 10 mg (-1.28 mm Hg [0.38], -0.48 mm Hg [0.26], 0.27 bpm [0.28]) was generally comparable, with the exception of a mean treatment difference of ~1 mm Hg in SBP between combination and solifenacin monotherapy; SBP was unchanged with combination and decreased with solifenacin monotherapy. Mean changes from baseline to EoT in ECG parameters were generally similar across treatment groups, except for QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula, which was higher with solifenacin 10 mg (3.30 mseconds) vs. combination (0.49 mseconds) and solifenacin 5 mg (0.77 mseconds). Conclusion: The comparable frequency of CV-related TEAEs, changes in vital signs and ECG parameters indicates no synergistic effect on CV safety outcomes when mirabegron and solifenacin are combined.
机译:©2017 John Wiley&Sons Ltd.摘要:目的/目标::在BESIDE研究中,联合治疗(抗毒蕈碱[solifenacin]和β3-肾上腺素能受体激动剂[mirabegron])比solifenacin单药具有更高的疗效,而不会加剧膀胱过度活动症患者的抗胆碱能副作用( OAB)患者;但是,对心血管(CV)系统的潜在协同作用需要研究。方法:OAB患者尽管在4周单盲试验中每天服用5mg索非那新仍保持失禁,但按1:1:1的比例随机分配至双盲每日组合(索非那新5毫克/米拉贝隆25毫克,每周增加至50毫克) 4),索非那新5或10毫克,持续12周。 CV安全性评估包括与CV相关的治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)的发生频率,生命体征相对于基线的变化(收缩压[SBP],舒张压[DBP],脉搏率)和心电图(ECG)参数。结果:高血压,心动过速和ECG QT延长的频率分别较低,并且在联合使用时(1.1%,0.3%,0.1%),索非那新5 mg(0.7%,0.1%,0.1%)和索非那新10mg相当组(0.8%,0%,0.1%)。 SBP,DBP和脉搏率从基线到治疗结束(EoT)的组合调整平均值(SE)变化(0.07 mm Hg [0.38],-0.35 mm Hg [0.26],0.47 bpm [0.28]),索非那新5 mg(-0.93 mm Hg [0.38],-0.45 mm Hg [0.26],0.43 bpm [0.28])和solifenacin 10 mg(-1.28 mm Hg [0.38],-0.48 mm Hg [0.26],0.27 bpm [0.28] )总体上具有可比性,但联合用药和索非那新单药治疗之间的SBP平均治疗差异约为1 mm Hg;联合用药后SBP无变化,单用索非那新则降低。除了使用Fridericia公式校正的QT间隔外,治疗组心电图参数从基线到EoT的平均变化通常相似,其中索非那新10 mg(3.30毫秒)高于联合用药(0.49毫秒)和索非那新5 mg(0.77毫秒) )。结论:与心血管相关的TEAE发生频率相当,生命体征和心电图参数变化表明,米拉贝隆和索非那新联合使用对心血管安全结果没有协同作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号