首页> 外文OA文献 >‘Forced Car Ownership’ in the UK and Germany: Socio-Spatial Patterns and Potential Economic Stress Impacts
【2h】

‘Forced Car Ownership’ in the UK and Germany: Socio-Spatial Patterns and Potential Economic Stress Impacts

机译:英国和德国的“强迫汽车所有权”:社会空间模式和潜在的经济压力影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The notion of ‘forced car ownership’ (FCO), born out of transport research on UK rural areas, is used to define households who own cars, despite limited economic resources. FCO is thought to result in households cutting expenditure on other necessities and/or reducing travel activity to the bare minimum, both of which may result in social exclusion. Social exclusion research, on the other hand, has paid much attention to ‘material deprivation’, i.e., the economic strain and enforced lack of durable goods arising from low income. However, the FCO phenomenon suggests that, among households with limited resources, the enforced possession and use of a durable good can be the cause of material deprivation, economic stress and vulnerability to fuel price increases. In this study, we use 2012 EU ‘Income and Living Conditions’ data (EU-SILC) to shed light on FCO in two European countries (UK and Germany). Through secondary data analysis we are able to show: the social and spatial patterns of FCO; key differences between FCO and ‘car deprived’ households; the intensity of social exclusion, material deprivation, and economic strain among FCO households; and overlaps between FCO and economic stress in other life domains (domestic fuel poverty, housing cost overburden). The results also show contrasting spatial patterns of FCO in Germany (higher incidence in rural areas) and UK (similar incidence in urban and rural areas), which can be explained in light of the different socio-spatial configurations prevalent in the two countries. We conclude by discussing implications for future research and policy-making.
机译:“强迫汽车拥有权”(FCO)的概念源于英国农村地区的交通运输研究,尽管经济资源有限,却被用来定义拥有汽车的家庭。人们认为FCO会导致家庭削减其他必需品的支出和/或将旅行活动减少到最低限度,这两者都可能导致社会排斥。另一方面,社会排斥研究则非常关注“物质匮乏”,即经济压力和由于低收入而导致的耐用商品的缺乏。但是,FCO现象表明,在资源有限的家庭中,对耐用物品的强制拥有和使用可能是造成物质匮乏,经济压力和燃油价格上涨脆弱性的原因。在这项研究中,我们使用了2012年欧盟“收入和生活条件”数据(EU-SILC)来阐明两个欧洲国家(英国和德国)的FCO。通过二次数据分析,我们可以显示:FCO的社会和空间格局; FCO与“汽车匮乏”家庭之间的主要区别; FCO家庭中的社会排斥,物质匮乏和经济压力的程度; FCO与其他生活领域的经济压力(家庭燃料贫乏,住房成本负担过重)之间存在重叠。结果还显示,德国(农村地区发病率较高)和英国(城市和农村地区发病率相似)的FCO的空间格局存在差异,这可以根据两国普遍存在的不同社会空间配置来解释。最后,我们讨论了对未来研究和决策的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mattioli G;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号