首页> 外文OA文献 >Is an ecosystem services-based approach developed for setting specific protection goals for plant protection products applicable to other chemicals?
【2h】

Is an ecosystem services-based approach developed for setting specific protection goals for plant protection products applicable to other chemicals?

机译:是否制定了基于生态系统服务的方法,为适用于其他化学品的植物保护产品制定具体的保护目标?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Clearly defined protection goals specifying what to protect, where and when, are required for designing scientifically sound risk assessments and effective risk management of chemicals. Environmental protection goals specified in EU legislation are defined in general terms, resulting in uncertainty in how to achieve them. In 2010, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published a framework to identify more specific protection goals based on ecosystem services potentially affected by plant protection products. But how applicable is this framework to chemicals with different emission scenarios and receptor ecosystems? Four case studies used to address this question were: (i) oil refinery waste water exposure in estuarine environments; (ii) oil dispersant exposure in aquatic environments; (iii) down the drain chemicals exposure in a wide range of ecosystems (terrestrial and aquatic); (iv) persistent organic pollutant exposure in remote (pristine) Arctic environments. A four-step process was followed to identify ecosystems and services potentially impacted by chemical emissions and to define specific protection goals. Case studies demonstrated that, in principle, the ecosystem services concept and the EFSA framework can be applied to derive specific protection goals for a broad range of chemical exposure scenarios. By identifying key habitats and ecosystem services of concern, the approach offers the potential for greater spatial and temporal resolution, together with increased environmental relevance, in chemical risk assessments. With modifications including improved clarity on terminology/definitions and further development/refinement of the key concepts, we believe the principles of the EFSA framework could provide a methodical approach to the identification and prioritization of ecosystems, ecosystem services and the service providing units that are most at risk from chemical exposure.
机译:明确定义的保护目标,指定在设计科学上合理的风险评估和有效的化学品风险管理时需要保护的内容,时间和地点。欧盟法规中规定的环境保护目标是笼统定义的,因此在实现目标方面存在不确定性。 2010年,欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)发布了一个框架,以根据可能受到植物保护产品影响的生态系统服务确定更具体的保护目标。但是,该框架对具有不同排放情景和受体生态系统的化学品的适用性如何?用于解决此问题的四个案例研究是:(i)河口环境中的炼油厂废水暴露; (ii)在水生环境中的油分散剂暴露; (iii)减少广泛生态系统(陆地和水生)中化学品的排放; (iv)在偏远(原始)北极环境中持续暴露于有机污染物中。遵循四步过程,以确定可能受到化学物质排放影响的生态系统和服务,并确定具体的保护目标。案例研究表明,原则上,生态系统服务概念和E​​FSA框架可用于为广泛的化学暴露情景推导特定的保护目标。通过确定重要的栖息地和生态系统服务,该方法在化学风险评估中提供了更大的时空分辨率以及与环境相关性增强的潜力。通过修改,包括提高术语/定义的清晰度以及关键概念的进一步发展/完善,我们相信EFSA框架的原则可以为识别和优先考虑生态系统,生态系统服务以及最重要的服务提供单位提供系统的方法。有化学暴露的危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号