首页> 外文OA文献 >Burning water: the water footprint of biofuel-based transport
【2h】

Burning water: the water footprint of biofuel-based transport

机译:燃烧水:基于生物燃料的运输的水足迹

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The trend towards substitution of conventional transport fuels by biofuels requires additional water. The EUudaims to replace 10 percent of total transport fuels by biofuels by 2020. This study calculates the water footprintud(WF) of different transport modes using bio-ethanol, biodiesel or bio-electricity and of European transport if 10udpercent of transport fuels is replaced by bio-ethanol. We compare results for Europe with similar goals for otherudregions (Africa, Asia, Latin America, the former USSR, Australia and North America). In order to provide audcontext, we compare results with WFs of food and cotton.udIn general, it is more efficient to use bio-electricity and bio-ethanol than biodiesel. Transport per train or electricudcar using bio-electricity (8-19 and 11-13 litres per passenger km) is more water efficient than transport by caruddriven by bio-ethanol (36-212) or by airplane using bio-ethanol (65-136 litres per passenger km). For cars, weudfind a range of a factor of ten between the most water-efficient car using bio-ethanol and the least efficient carudusing biodiesel. When using bio-energy, freight can be transported in the most water-efficient way by ship orudtrain; airplanes are the least water efficient.udThe European goal to have 10 percent biofuel in transport in 2020 will result in a water footprint of 62 Gm3 perudyear. This is equal to about 10% of the current European water footprint of food and cotton consumption.udDifferences in per capita energy use for transport among European countries, together with differences inudproduction systems, result in a broad range of transport-related WFs: from 60 m3 per year per capita in Bulgariaudto 500 m3 per year per capita in Finland. If the same 10% biofuel target would be applied in all other regions ofudthe world as well, the additional water footprint of China would be equivalent to 5% of the water footprintudrelated to food and cotton consumption, in the rest of Asia 3%, in Africa 4%, in Latin America 10%, in theudformer USSR 22% and both in North America and Australia 52%. The global water consumption related toudbiofuel-based transport in this scenario would be 9% of the current global water consumption for food andudcotton. The results show that a trend towards the increased application of biofuels in transport will substantiallyudenhance the competition for fresh water resources.
机译:生物燃料替代传统运输燃料的趋势需要更多的水。欧盟 u uim到2020年将用生物燃料替代总运输燃料的10%。本研究计算使用生物乙醇,生物柴油或生物电的不同运输方式的水足迹 ud(WF),如果使用10 udpercent,则计算欧洲运输方式的运输燃料已被生物乙醇替代。我们将欧洲的结果与其他 ud地区(非洲,亚洲,拉丁美洲,前苏联,澳大利亚和北美)的目标相比较。为了提供上下文,我们将结果与食品和棉花的WF进行比较。 ud通常,使用生物电和生物乙醇比使用生物柴油更有效。与使用生物乙醇(36-212)或乘飞机使用生物乙醇的汽车乘火车运输相比,使用生物电的每列火车或电动汽车(每乘客公里8-19和11-13升)的水效率更高。 (每位乘客每公里65-136升)。对于汽车,我们发现使用生物乙醇的节水效率最高的汽车与使用生物柴油的效率最低的汽车之间的距离是十倍。当使用生物能源时,可以通过船或火车以最节水的方式运输货物。欧洲目标是到2020年将生物燃料的运输量提高到10%,这样一来,每年的水足迹将达到62 Gm3。这大约相当于当前欧洲粮食和棉花消费水足迹的10%。 ud欧洲国家之间人均运输能源消耗的差异,加上 ud生产系统的差异,导致了与运输相关的WF种类繁多。 :从保加利亚的人均每年60立方米到芬兰的人均每年500立方米。如果将同样的10%生物燃料目标也应用到世界其他所有地区,那么在亚洲其他地区,中国的额外水足迹将相当于与粮食和棉花消费有关的水足迹的5%。 3%,非洲4%,拉丁美洲10%,苏联前22%,北美和澳大利亚均为52%。在这种情况下,与基于生物燃料的运输相关的全球用水量将占当前全球粮食和棉花用水量的9%。结果表明,在运输中增加使用生物燃料的趋势将极大地增强对淡水资源的竞争。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号