首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of PSDA and CCA detection methods in a SSVEP-based BCI-system
【2h】

Comparison of PSDA and CCA detection methods in a SSVEP-based BCI-system

机译:基于ssVEp的BCI系统中psDa和CCa检测方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) in brain-computer interface (BCI) systems is the subject of a lot of research. One of the most popular and widely used detection method is using a power spectral density analysis (PSDA). Lately there have been some new methods emerging, one of them is using canonical correlation analysis (CCA) which seems to have some promising improvements and advantages compared to traditional SSVEP detection methods, like better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), lower inter-subject variability and the possibility to use harmonic frequencies, i.e., a serie of frequencies which have the same fundamental frequency. In this research two different SSVEP detection methods, one using PSDA and one using CCA are compared. The results show that the CCA-based detection method performs significantly better than the PSDA-based detection method. The increase of performance can in particular be seen when using harmonic frequencies. While the PSDA-based detection method has difficulties detecting harmonic frequencies, the CCA-based detection method is able to detect harmonic frequencies.
机译:在脑机接口(BCI)系统中使用稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)是许多研究的主题。最流行和广泛使用的检测方法之一是使用功率谱密度分析(PSDA)。最近出现了一些新方法,其中一种是使用规范相关分析(CCA),与传统的SSVEP检测方法相比,它似乎具有一些有希望的改进和优势,例如更好的信噪比(SNR),更低的互感-对象的可变性和使用谐波频率的可能性,即具有相同基本频率的一系列频率。在这项研究中,比较了两种不同的SSVEP检测方法,一种使用PSDA,另一种使用CCA。结果表明,基于CCA的检测方法的性能明显优于基于PSDA的检测方法。使用谐波频率时,尤其可以看到性能的提高。尽管基于PSDA的检测方法难以检测谐波频率,但基于CCA的检测方法却能够检测谐波频率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号