首页> 外文OA文献 >Outcomes and Well-being Part 2: A comparative longitudinal study of two models of homecare delivery and their impact upon the older person self-reported subjective well-being. A qualitative follow up study paper
【2h】

Outcomes and Well-being Part 2: A comparative longitudinal study of two models of homecare delivery and their impact upon the older person self-reported subjective well-being. A qualitative follow up study paper

机译:结果和福祉第2部分:两种家庭护理服务模式的比较纵向研究及其对老年人自我报告的主观幸福感的影响。定性跟进研究论文

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose – This paper aims to follow up on a previous quantitative research project which established that outcome-focussed care appeared to be associated with an increase in the individuals’ subjective well-being. The purpose of this paper is to establish why the intervention enabled this.udDesign/methodology/approach – The study utilised a qualitative approach to gather the subjective experience of the individual service users. The sample consisted of 20 service users, who were subject of two semi-structured interviews; one interview at the start of the intervention and one at the six month stage. The data were then analysed under core themes raised by the service user in these interviews. The sample was divided into two, with one group receiving the outcome-focussed model of care and the other group receiving the traditional time focussed care.udFindings – The research established that service users’ subjective well-being improved due to the ability of outcome-focussed care to provide consistency, flexibility and most importantly the ability of the service user to form a relationship with the homecare workers providing their care.udPractical implications – This paper will assist professionals to understand why outcome-focus care has a profound impact upon service users’ subjective well-being as opposed to the existing task focussed care.udOriginality/value – This and the previous paper provide an insight into how different processes and models of intervention impact upon the subjective well-being of socially isolated older people.
机译:目的–本文旨在跟进先前的定量研究项目,该项目确定以结果为中心的护理似乎与个人主观幸福感的增加有关。本文的目的是确定干预为何能够实现这一目标。 udDesign /方法/方法-这项研究采用定性方法来收集各个服务用户的主观体验。该样本由20位服务用户组成,他们分别接受了两次半结构化访谈。在干预开始时进行一次采访,在六个月阶段进行一次采访。然后,根据服务用户在这些访谈中提出的核心主题对数据进行分析。该样本分为两部分,一组接受以结果为中心的护理模式,另一组接受传统的以时间为中心的护理。 udFindings –研究表明,服务用户的主观幸福感会因结果的能力而得到改善重点的护理可提供一致性,灵活性,最重要的是服务使用者与提供护理的家庭护理人员建立关系的能力。 ud实践意义–本文将帮助专业人士理解以结果为中心的护理为何对医疗服务产生深远影响服务使用者的主观幸福感,而不是现有的以任务为中心的护理。 udOriginity / value –本白皮书和上一篇文章提供了对不同的干预过程和模型如何影响社会上孤立的老年人的主观幸福感的见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gethin-Jones Stephen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号