首页> 外文OA文献 >Economic performance of industrial development on collective land in the urbanization process in China: Empirical evidence from Shenzhen
【2h】

Economic performance of industrial development on collective land in the urbanization process in China: Empirical evidence from Shenzhen

机译:中国城市化进程中集体土地产业发展的经济绩效 - 来自深圳的经验证据

摘要

The study investigates the economic performance of industrial development in the Chinese urbanization process under two different property rights arrangements. Industrial development contributes significantly to China's economic growth in the urbanization process. As one of the most fundamental institutional arrangements, the urban-rural dual land system is important in urbanization and industrial development in China. Two types of land system including state and collective ownership coexist in the current land administration system. According to the law, the state owns the urban land, whereas the village collective owns the rural land. State requisition is the only channel to convert rural land to urban land. Village collectives are not allowed to transfer their land for urban use. Therefore, the property rights on collective land are incomplete in the urbanization process. Do incomplete property rights cause unsatisfactory economic performance of industrial development on collective land? Based on community-level data from two districts with an area of 1557km2 in Shenzhen in 2006, a regression analysis shows that incomplete property rights have caused significant land use inefficiency in industrial development in terms of lower land rental value and lower industrial value added per unit of land. The findings suggest that monthly rental prices of industrial plants on collective land were approximately 57% less than those on state land in 2006. The industrial value produced on collective land was RMB 6.624 billion less than on state land per km2. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
机译:该研究调查了两种不同产权安排下中国城市化过程中工业发展的经济绩效。在城市化进程中,工业发展为中国的经济增长做出了重要贡献。作为最基本的制度安排之一,城乡二元土地制度对中国的城市化和工业发展具有重要意义。在现行的土地管理制度中,国有和集体所有两种土地制度共存。根据法律,国家拥有城市土地,而村集体拥有农村土地。国家征用是将农村土地转为城市土地的唯一途径。村集体不得转让土地供城市使用。因此,集体化土地的产权在城市化过程中是不完整的。产权不完整会导致集体土地上工业发展的经济表现不佳吗?根据2006年深圳两个面积为1557km2的社区的社区数据,回归分析显示,不完整的产权导致较低的土地租赁价值和较低的单位工业增加值,在工业发展中造成了严重的土地利用效率低下土地。调查结果表明,集体土地上工业厂房的月租金价格比2006年国有土地上的租金低约57%。集体土地上的工业产值每平方公里比国有土地上少人民币66.24亿元。 ©2013爱思唯尔有限公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号