首页> 外文OA文献 >Asking for action or information? Crosslinguistic comparison of interrogative functions in early child Cantonese and Mandarin
【2h】

Asking for action or information? Crosslinguistic comparison of interrogative functions in early child Cantonese and Mandarin

机译:要求采取行动或信息?早期儿童广东话与普通话疑问函数的跨语言比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Request for information (RfI) is believed to be the universally dominant function of young children’s questioning, whereas request for action (RfA) has been reported to be the leading interrogative form used in early child Cantonese. The possibility of crosslinguistic variability prompts further research and comparison with additional languages. This study compares the interrogatives elicited from two early Chinese language corpora: Early Childhood Cantonese Corpus (ECCC) and Early Childhood Mandarin (ECMC). Altogether, 1214 and 942 question types were elicited from ECCC and ECMC, respectively. Analyses indicated that: (1) all the interrogative functions identified in an earlier study of Cantonese were also observed in the early Mandarin interrrogatives; and (2) both RfA (49.9%) and RfI (45.5%) were the most frequently observed functions of early child Chinese interrogatives. This crosslinguistic evidence suggests that follow-up studies are needed to further explore the possible influences of language, culture and communication tasks on children’s uses of interrogative forms.
机译:信息询问(RfI)被认为是幼儿提问的普遍主导功能,而据报道,行动请求(RfA)是幼儿广东话中使用的主要询问形式。跨语言可变性的可能性促使人们进一步研究并与其他语言进行比较。这项研究比较了两种早期中文语料库引起的疑问句:幼儿广东话语料库(ECCC)和幼儿汉语普通话(ECMC)。总共从ECCC和ECMC分别得出1214和942个问题类型。分析表明:(1)在早期的普通话疑问句中也观察到了广东话早期研究中确定的所有疑问句功能; (2)RfA(49.9%)和RfI(45.5%)都是中国早期儿童疑问句中最常见的功能。这种跨语言证据表明,需要进行后续研究,以进一步探讨语言,文化和交流任务对儿童使用疑问句形式的可能影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号