首页> 外文OA文献 >Governance and City Regeneration - A New Methodological Approach for Design and Evaluation
【2h】

Governance and City Regeneration - A New Methodological Approach for Design and Evaluation

机译:治理与城市再生 - 一种新的设计与评价方法论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Governance has become a central topic among policymakers. There is an international consensus that policymaking is evolving from a traditional top-down government approach towards a system of governing that focuses on engaging the citizens within an area (Cabus, 2003). New forms of governance targeting urban competitiveness are increasingly oriented to vertical (between lower and high levels of government and cooperation forms between entities and firms along the production chain) and horizontal (between firms or different municipalities or public and private entities) cooperation (OEDC, 2005). Urban renewal policies underwent significant changes in recent decades. Synthetically, the following periods can be distinguished: 1970s: "hard" urban renewal - extensive physical interventions; 1980s: "soft" urban renewal - efforts to keep the original population in place; 1990s: "integrated urban renewal" - combining physical, economic and social interventions (Tosics, 2010). And over the last few years there has been a gradual shift in the understanding of what should be the tools and objectives of urban regeneration policies, with a greater emphasis on process-related and u2018soft' issues of stakeholder engagement, partnership formation, leadership development, u2018institutional capacity' development, knowledge and learning (Magalhue3es, 2004). This shift in the understanding of urban regeneration processes accomplishes the growing importance in literature of concepts like urban governance, institutional relational density, creativity, social capital, city branding and place marketing. The main purpose of this paper is to propose a new methodology for territorial analysis and planning focused on urban regeneration processes and its governance mechanisms. A new methodology that seeks, for each specific urban context, contribute to the following results: 1) Help select the most appropriate governance model to be adopted for each process of urban regeneration, 2) Monitor the partnership process and help promote the partnership guidance; 3) Support the design process and the definition of the strategic approach and projects, 4) Monitor the process of implementing the strategy and support multidimensional and multiscale evaluation of its results; 5) Evaluate the socio-economic and territorial impacts of urban regeneration processes.
机译:治理已成为决策者的中心话题。国际上已经达成共识,政策制定正在从传统的自上而下的政府方法发展为侧重于使一个地区的公民参与的治理体系(Cabus,2003年)。针对城市竞争力的新型治理形式越来越侧重于垂直合作(在上下级政府之间以及生产链上的实体与企业之间的合作形式)和横向合作(企业或不同市政当局或公共与私人实体之间的合作)(OEDC, 2005年)。近几十年来,城市更新政策发生了重大变化。综合而言,可以区分以下时期:1970年代:“艰苦的”城市更新-广泛的物理干预; 1980年代:“软”的城市更新-努力保持原始人口到位; 1990年代:“综合城市更新”-结合物理,经济和社会干预(Tosics,2010年)。在过去的几年中,人们对城市更新政策的工具和目标的认识逐渐发生了变化,重点更多地放在与过程相关的,利益相关者参与,伙伴关系形成,领导力发展等问题上。 , u2018机构能力的发展,知识和学习(Magalh ue3es,2004年)。对城市更新过程的理解上的这种转变,在文学中越来越重视诸如城市治理,机构关系密度,创造力,社会资本,城市品牌和场所营销等概念。本文的主要目的是为领土分析和规划提出一种新方法,重点是城市更新过程及其治理机制。一种针对每种特定城市背景寻求新结果的新方法将有助于以下结果:1)帮助选择最合适的治理模型,以用于每个城市更新过程; 2)监控伙伴关系过程并帮助促进伙伴关系指导; 3)支持设计过程以及战略方法和项目的定义; 4)监视策略的实施过程,并支持对其结果的多维和多尺度评估; 5)评估城市更新过程的社会经济和领土影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号