首页> 外文OA文献 >On Risk, Leverage and Banks: Do highly Leveraged Banks take on Excessive Risk?
【2h】

On Risk, Leverage and Banks: Do highly Leveraged Banks take on Excessive Risk?

机译:风险,杠杆和银行:高杠杆银行是否承担过度风险?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper deals with the relation between excessive risk taking and capital structure in banks. Examining a quarterly dataset of U.S. banks between 1993 and 2010, we find that equity is valued higher when more risky portfolios are chosen when leverage is high, and that more risk taking has a negative impact on valuation of the debt of highly leveraged banks. We find no evidence that deposit insurance is encouraging risk taking behaviour. We do find that banks with a more troubled loan portfolio take on more risk. Banks whose share price has slumped tend to gamblefor resurrection by increasing the riskiness of their asset portfolios. The results suggest that incentives embedded in the capital structure of banks contribute to systemic fragility, and so support the Basel III proposals towards less leverage and higher loss absorption capacity of capital.
机译:本文探讨了银行过度冒险与资本结构之间的关系。考察1993年至2010年美国银行的季度数据集,我们发现,在杠杆率高的情况下选择风险较高的投资组合时,股票的价值较高,而承担更多的风险会对高杠杆率银行的债务估值产生负面影响。我们没有发现任何证据表明存款保险可以鼓励冒险行为。我们确实发现,贷款组合问题更加严重的银行承担的风险更大。股价下跌的银行往往会通过增加资产组合的风险来赌博以求复活。结果表明,银行资本结构中包含的激励机制会导致系统脆弱性,因此支持《巴塞尔协议III》关于减少杠杆和提高资本吸收损失能力的提议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号