首页> 外文OA文献 >Cultural assimilation, cultural diffusion and the origin of the wealth of nations
【2h】

Cultural assimilation, cultural diffusion and the origin of the wealth of nations

机译:文化同化,文化传播和国家财富的起源

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research argues that variations in the interplay between cultural assimilation and cultural diffusion have played a significant role in giving rise to differential patterns of economic development across the globe. Societies that were geographically less vulnerable to cultural diffusion, benefited from enhanced assimilation, lower cultural diversity and, thus, more intense accumulation of society-specific human capital, enabling them to flourish in the technological paradigm that characterized the agricultural stage of development. The lack of cultural diffusion and its manifestation in cultural rigidity, however, diminished the ability of these societies to adapt to a new technological paradigm, which delayed their industrialization and, thereby, their take-off to a state of sustained economic growth. The theory contributes to the understanding of the advent of divergence and overtaking in the process of long-run development, attributing the dominance of some societies within a given technological regime to a superior operation of cultural assimilation, while the success of others in the switch between technological regimes to a higher frequency of cultural diffusion and the beneficial effect of diversity on the adaptability of society to a changing technological environment. Thus, in contrast to the cultural and institutional hypotheses, which posit a hierarchy of cultural and institutional attributes in terms of their conduciveness to innovation and their ability in fostering industrialization, the proposed theory suggests that the desirable degree of the relative prevalence of cultural assimilation versus cultural diffusion varies according to the stage of development. Enhanced cultural assimilation is optimal within a given stage of development, but is detrimental for the transition between technological regimes. Therefore, while cultural traits themselves do not necessarily have a differential effect on the process of development, it is the variation in the relative strengths of the forces of cultural assimilation and cultural diffusion, which together determine the heterogeneity of these traits, that is instrumental for comparative economic development.
机译:这项研究认为,文化同化和文化扩散之间相互作用的变化在引起全球经济发展差异模式方面发挥了重要作用。在地理上较不易受文化传播影响的社会,得益于同化的增强,文化多样性的降低以及因此社会专用人力资本的更密集的积累,使它们能够在农业发展阶段的技术范式中蓬勃发展。但是,缺乏文化传播及其在文化僵化中的表现,削弱了这些社会适应新技术范式的能力,从而延缓了它们的工业化进程,从而使它们迈向了持续的经济增长状态。该理论有助于理解长期发展过程中出现的分歧和超车现象,将某些社会在给定技术体制下的主导地位归功于文化同化的卓越运作,而其他社会的成功则在于两者之间的转换。技术制度,以提高文化传播的频率,以及多样性对社会适应变化的技术环境的有利影响。因此,与文化和制度假说形成对比的是文化和制度假说,文化假说和制度假说根据其对创新的促进作用和促进工业化的能力提出了层次结构,而该理论则认为,文化同化与文化传播因发展阶段而异。增强的文化同化在特定的发展阶段是最佳的,但不利于技术体系之间的过渡。因此,虽然文化特质本身不一定会对发展过程产生不同的影响,但文化同化和文化传播力量的相对强度的变化共同决定了这些特质的异质性,这有助于文化特质的发展。比较经济发展。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ashraf Quamrul; Galor Oded;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号