首页> 外文OA文献 >Suburbanisation of employment means less sustainable travel? - The effects of policy location on commuters' travel patterns in the Stavanger region, Norway
【2h】

Suburbanisation of employment means less sustainable travel? - The effects of policy location on commuters' travel patterns in the Stavanger region, Norway

机译:就业郊区化意味着可持续旅行减少? - 政策地点对挪威斯塔万格地区通勤者旅行模式的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The growth and expansion of commercial locations followed by urban sprawl and significant change in demographic and socio-demographic characteristics of urban resident have taken place in the Stavanger region, Norway - partly due to its role as 'the Petroleum Capital of Norway'. Most notable evidence are: (1) suburbanisation of employment due to the rapid development of the petroleum-based businesses, manufacturing companies and service enterprises in the region and its satellite region; (2) increased labour force participation, in particular by skilled workers and women; (3) growing proportion of immigration from inter-region of Norway as well as international, responding its dynamic labour market; (4) general increases in income; (5) changing population structure caused by significant percentage of young professional individuals; (6) and also great proportion of auto ownership and auto dependency. For example, the local authority has developed the industrial parks, known as the Forus area which is situated in the south-west of the Stavanger city centre. Currently, there are more than 1200 businesses located in this area and this provides opportunities for more than 24000 professionals, indicating that its employment density is extremely high. This, however, means that auto dependency of the Forus area-based commuters has reached by nearly 82 % of total mode choices used. The effects of industrialisation in suburbs on travel behavior are complex and not clear yet. One argues that suburbanisation of employment is inevitable in recent era in order to provide better accessibility of jobs and to reduce attractiveness of city centre in the same time. Therefore, how local authority connects their residents and workplaces and to break dependency on auto is the issue since commuters tend to use auto. This case is more obvious in particular if the quality of installed transport infrastructure is relatively poor. Whiles, others recommend jobs-housing balance supported by mixed-zone policy to control negative impacts of workplace sprawl. Allowing urbanisation of employment alone without considering travel distance balance leads to a less sustainable travel patterns because the higher the commuting distance the much more likely individuals tend to be depending on auto. This study is an attempt to determine the effects of suburbanisation of employment on commuting travel patterns. The questions raised are: Does suburbanisation of employment lead to an increase of commuting travel time (and distance), auto use, energy consumption, and the spatial extension of their action space? If so, who still have more sustainable commuting travel patterns? Who don't? Also, how sustainable is their commuting travel patterns compared to other groups of commuter in the region? Which factors tend influence auto dependency? The focus of this study is on commuters. Results of travel behaviour survey in the Stavanger area, conducted in summer 2008, are examined in this study to evaluate the effects of suburbanisation of employment on travel. The study depicts the commuters in the Forus area as the sample size and compares its behavioural patterns with the city centre-based commuters of the Stavanger region and the other commuters who reside in between the city centre and the Forus area. A set of multivariate analyses and other statistical tools are utilised to examine at the individual level, with auto ownership, public transport use, travel distance and travel time performed as its dependent variables. Using the results it is shown who tends to commute longer and who don't. Also factors that influence auto dependency are captured and the characteristics of the sustainable commuters are identified. Evaluating this policy location is necessary as a study reported that it may be pragmatically and politically more acceptable to change policies in primarily employment areas, because the users of those areas may have fewer complaints about more intense development than residential users typically do. In addition, the resultant model system is applied in a scenario analysis to forecast possible changes in future auto travel that will follow hypothetical spatial changes in the Stavanger region.
机译:挪威斯塔万格地区发生了商业地点的增长和扩展,随后出现了城市蔓延以及城市居民的人口统计学和社会人口学特征的重大变化,部分原因是其作为“挪威石油之都”的角色。最明显的证据是:(1)由于该地区及其附属地区的石油企业,制造公司和服务企业的快速发展,导致就业郊区化; (2)增加劳动力的参与,特别是熟练工人和妇女的参与; (3)挪威跨地区乃至国际移民的比例不断增加,以应对其动态的劳动力市场; (四)一般收入增加; (5)大量年轻专业人员造成的人口结构变化; (6)以及汽车所有权和汽车依赖的很大一部分。例如,地方当局已经开发了工业园区,被称为Forus区,位于斯塔万格市中心的西南部。目前,该地区有1200多家企业,这为24000多名专业人员提供了机会,这表明其就业密度非常高。但是,这意味着基于Forus区域的通勤者的自动依赖性已达到使用的总模式选择的近82%。郊区工业化对出行行为的影响是复杂的,尚不清楚。有人认为,就业郊区化在近代时代是不可避免的,以便同时提供更好的工作机会并减少城市中心的吸引力。因此,由于通勤者倾向于使用汽车,因此地方当局如何连接其居民和工作场所并打破对汽车的依赖是一个问题。在已安装的运输基础设施的质量相对较差的情况下,这种情况尤其明显。有时候,其他人则建议在混合区政策的支持下保持工作与住房的平衡,以控制工作场所扩张的负面影响。仅允许就业的城市化而不考虑出行距离的平衡会导致可持续发展的出行方式较差,因为通勤距离越高,个人倾向于依靠汽车的可能性就越大。这项研究旨在确定就业郊区化对通勤出行方式的影响。提出的问题是:郊区化就业是否会导致通勤时间(和距离),汽车使用,能源消耗以及他们行动空间的空间扩展的增加?如果是这样,谁还会有更可持续的通勤出行方式?谁不?此外,与该地区的其他通勤人群相比,他们的通勤旅行方式可持续性如何?哪些因素会影响自动依赖性?这项研究的重点是通勤者。在这项研究中,我们考察了2008年夏季在斯塔万格(Stavanger)地区出行行为的调查结果,以评估郊区化就业对出行的影响。该研究将福鲁斯地区的通勤者描绘为样本数量,并将其行为模式与斯塔万格地区以城市为中心的通勤者以及居住在市中心和福鲁斯地区之间的其他通勤者进行比较。利用一组多元分析和其他统计工具在个人层面上进行检查,并以汽车拥有权,公共交通工具的使用,出行距离和出行时间为因变量。使用结果可以显示谁通勤时间更长,谁不通勤。还捕获了影响自动依赖的因素,并确定了可持续通勤者的特征。评估此政策的位置是必要的,因为一项研究报告说,在主要就业地区更改政策可能在务实和政治上更容易接受,因为与居住区用户相比,这些地区的用户对更激烈的发展的抱怨较少。此外,将结果模型系统应用于情景分析中,以预测未来的汽车旅行中可能发生的变化,这些变化将遵循斯塔万格地区的假设空间变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号