首页> 外文OA文献 >The peasant's rescue from the cadre? An institutional analysis of China's rural tax and fee reform
【2h】

The peasant's rescue from the cadre? An institutional analysis of China's rural tax and fee reform

机译:农民从干部那里救出?中国农村税费改革的制度分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Applying a historical institutionalist perspective, this paper examines the genesis, implementation process and impact of the recent Rural Tax and Fee Reform (RTFR) in China. It is posited that the RTFR represents a serious, although inconsistent, attempt to shift the balance of central-local relations toward the centre via stricter regulation of county and subcounty politics. It is further argued that this attempt to restructure the polity is not matched by the adjustment of the policy process. As the former is pushed towards significant change in the realm of central-local relations, the latter remains unchanged. More concretely, the centre has taken a results-oriented view of central-local relations, a path that has begun with the implementation of a planned economy, and not occupied itself with the formal regulation of the policy processes that are supposed to create these results. At the same time, local politics is path-dependent in the sense that Reform and Opening gave local governments the incentive to create informal institutions to pursue their own economic and policy goals. With central and county politics running along these two divergent paths, trying to change the polity in a way that benefits only one of the players becomes impossible if the centre is not prepared to apply massive coercion. Not only do such tactics fail to reduce social tension, but they also produce additional political tension. These elements do not bode well for sustained burden reduction.
机译:本文采用历史制度主义的观点,考察了近期中国农村税费改革(RTFR)的产生,实施过程和影响。人们认为,RTFR代表了一种严重的(尽管不一致)的尝试,它试图通过对县和县以下政治的更严格的监管来将中央与地方关系的平衡转移到中心。有人进一步认为,调整政体的这种尝试与政策过程的调整是不匹配的。随着前者被推向中央与地方关系领域的重大变化,后者保持不变。更具体地讲,该中心采取了以结果为导向的观点,看待中央与地方之间的关系,这是从计划经济的实施开始的,而不是被旨在产生这些结果的政策过程的正式监管所占据。 。同时,在改革和开放给地方政府提供动力来建立非正式机构以追求自己的经济和政策目标的意义上,地方政治是路径依赖的。随着中央和县级政治沿着这两条不同的道路运转,如果中心不准备施加大规模胁迫,试图以仅使一个参与者受益的方式改变政局就变得不可能了。这样的策略不仅不能减轻社会紧张感,而且还会产生额外的政治紧张感。这些要素对于持续减轻负担并不是好兆头。

著录项

  • 作者

    Guf6bel Christian;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号