首页> 外文OA文献 >Provision of public goods in a federalist country: Tiebout competition, fiscal equalization, and incentives for efficiency in Switzerland
【2h】

Provision of public goods in a federalist country: Tiebout competition, fiscal equalization, and incentives for efficiency in Switzerland

机译:在联邦制国家提供公共产品:在瑞士举办竞争,财政均等化和提高效率的激励措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the efficiency of the 26 Swiss cantons over the period 2000 to 2004 applying Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). A Total Public Sector Performance (TPSP) indicator for eight local government activities (administration, public safety, education, culture and sport, health, transportation, environment and spatial planning, and public economy) is calculated to measure technical efficiency. Efficiency scores are then related to the fiscal equalization scheme designed to reduce disparities between cantons with the expectation to find a negative relationship. Results show the existing scheme to indeed have a negative influence on the performance of financially advantaged cantons. Surprisingly, however, earmarked transfers from the confederation to the cantons are not found to have a stronger negative influence on cantonal performance, contradicting the rationale for their suppression in a recent reform. Most public services fail to exhibit economies of scale, undermining quests for centralization of public good provision and suggesting the possibility of Tiebout competition.
机译:本文的目的是应用数据包络分析(DEA)分析2000年至2004年瑞士26个州的效率。计算了八个地方政府活动(行政,公共安全,教育,文化和体育,卫生,交通,环境和空间规划以及公共经济)的公共部门总绩效指标(TPSP),以衡量技术效率。效率得分然后与旨在减少各州之间的差异的财政均等化方案相关,并期望找到负相关关系。结果表明,现有方案确实对具有经济优势的州的绩效产生负面影响。但是,令人惊讶的是,没有发现从联邦到州的专项转移对州的表现有更强的负面影响,这与在最近的改革中压制它们的理由背道而驰。大多数公共服务未能展现规模经济,破坏了对公共物品提供集中化的追求,并暗示了蒂布特竞争的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号