首页> 外文OA文献 >The 'hidden hypothesis'- approach in evaluation methodology: The Swiss participation in the European INTERREG II- Programme
【2h】

The 'hidden hypothesis'- approach in evaluation methodology: The Swiss participation in the European INTERREG II- Programme

机译:评估方法中的“隐藏假设”方法:瑞士参与欧洲INTERREG II-计划

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Regional development, and crossborder cooperation in particular, needs feedbacks on the impacts of public policies. Policy evaluation is one appropriate tool. The ?hidden hypothesis'- approach is characterized by two elements: (1) an emphasis on the invisible goals of an evaluated programme or instrument and (2) a strong orientation towards processes of learning and motivation with the actors involved. (1) The formulation of political programmes tends to integrate as much different interests as possible. Such goal-setting processes simplify political agreement. But to evaluate such programmes with all their different and partly conflicting goals creates problems. The quality of an evaluation cannot be better as the quality of the evaluated goals and conflicting goals lead straight forward to conflicting results. (2) Evaluating the results of a political programme is also confronted with problems of measurement. Evaluation methodology normally distinguishes output, impact and outcome of a programme or a project. In general it is very tricky to evaluate the outcome. Thus the presented approach of evaluation works with different logic. The approach aims at enabling the actors concerned to modify and rearrange their activities. The evaluator acts as moderator and gives inputs for the necessary learning processes. This approach can be used especially in intermediate evaluations and monitoring. The case of the Swiss participation to the European INTERREG II- Programme shows a great complexity concerning political goals and concerning the cooperation in a federalistic political structure. Therefore the casestudy is a good example to demonstrate the advantages of the approach: In 1992 the Swiss population voted against joining the European Economic Market Treaty. The narrow rejection by plebiscite lead to intense discussions about the national cohesion. Afterwards the federal strategy to move the country towards an European integration has been based on a piecemeal approach and small projects of crossborder micro-integration. As an important strategic policy instrument the Swiss government decided to contribute to the INTERREG II- Programme of crossborder cooperation with own ressources of co-financing. In this situation the system of goals connected with the participation in INTERREG II is very complex: The different explicite and implicite goals can be categorized by a double dichotomy: On the one hand the tension between the goal of European integration and the goal of (Swiss) regional development. On the other hand the tension between active policy steering and re-active coordinating. Both relationsships are overlapping and influence the administrative levels between central government and the single local project. To evaluate this policy is a work of great complexity. Key words: evaluation methodology, regional crossborder development, INTERREG, Switzerland
机译:区域发展,尤其是跨界合作,需要就公共政策的影响提供反馈。政策评估是一种适当的工具。 “隐藏的假设”方法的特征包括两个要素:(1)强调被评估程序或工具的无形目标;(2)对与参与者有关的学习和动机过程的强烈取向。 (1)政治纲领的拟定倾向于融合尽可能多的不同利益。这种设定目标的过程简化了政治协议。但是,要评估具有所有不同且部分矛盾的目标的此类程序会产生问题。评估的质量不会更好,因为评估的目标和相互矛盾的目标的质量会直接导致相互矛盾的结果。 (2)评价政治计划的结果也面临衡量问题。评估方法通常区分计划或项目的输出,影响和结果。通常,评估结果非常棘手。因此,所提出的评估方法具有不同的逻辑。该方法旨在使有关行动者能够修改和重新安排其活动。评估者充当主持人,并为必要的学习过程提供输入。该方法尤其可以用于中间评估和监视。瑞士参加欧洲INTERREG II-计划的案例表明,政治目标和联邦制政治结构中的合作非常复杂。因此,案例研究是证明该方法优势的一个很好的例子:1992年,瑞士民众投票反对加入《欧洲经济市场条约》。公民投票的狭rejection拒绝引起了关于民族凝聚力的激烈讨论。此后,联邦政府使该国迈向欧洲一体化的战略是基于零星的方法和跨境微型一体化的小型项目。作为一项重要的战略政策工具,瑞士政府决定以自己的共同出资资源为INTERREG II跨界合作计划做出贡献。在这种情况下,与参加INTERREG II有关的目标系统非常复杂:显式和隐式目标可以通过双重二分法进行分类:一方面,欧洲一体化目标与(瑞士)目标之间存在紧张关系。 )区域发展。另一方面,积极的政策指导与积极的协调之间存在紧张关系。两国关系重叠,并影响中央政府与单个地方项目之间的行政管理水平。评估此政策是一项非常复杂的工作。关键词:评估方法论,区域跨境发展,INTERREG,瑞士

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号