首页> 外文OA文献 >New directions in Japanese bank-firm-relationships: does a relationship matter for corporate performance?
【2h】

New directions in Japanese bank-firm-relationships: does a relationship matter for corporate performance?

机译:日本银行与公司关系的新方向:关系对公司业绩有影响吗?

摘要

The paper is a first step to tests the impact of bank-firm-relationships on corporate performance under changing economic conditions. Using a data set of standardized annual financial statements of 100 Japanese corporations all listed at the First Section of the Tokyo stock exchange, at the current stage of analysis we find empirical evidence that: (1) investment is determined by output expectations. (2) Q is a significant variable for investment behavior. (3) Investment is restricted by debt-equity ratio, (4) therefore the much claimed signaling effect of a high debt-equity ratio does not hold. (5) In contrast to Germany though, banks allow firms with bank-relationships higher short term debt to total finance and long term loans to total finance ratios, whereas firms with no relationships have a higher equity ratio. (6) Banks influence firms with bank-relationships to decide on low risk investment decisions. Therefore they are able to allow a higher debt-equity ratio (in contrast to Germany). (7) Non-bank-related firms are much more profitable than bank-related firms. The difference is even stronger than in Germany. Yet they also have to bear a higher amount of risk. (8) Apparently the policy of banks in Japan is much different to German banks: Banks force bank-affiliated firms to follow an investment policy, which is much more cautious and therefore leads to less profitability. This again leads to a bank-policy that allows to supply these firms with higher amounts of borrowings.
机译:本文是测试在不断变化的经济条件下银行-公司关系对公司绩效的影响的第一步。使用在东京证券交易所第一部分列出的全部100家日本公司的标准化年度财务报表的数据集,在当前分析阶段,我们发现以下经验证据:(1)投资由产出预期决定。 (2)Q是投资行为的重要变量。 (3)投资受到债务权益比率的限制,(4)因此,高债权益比率所宣称的信号效应不成立。 (5)与德国相反,银行允许具有银行关系的公司的短期债务对总融资的比率较高,而长期贷款对总融资的比率较高,而没有关系的公司的权益比率较高。 (6)银行影响具有银行关系的公司来决定低风险投资决策。因此,它们能够允许更高的债务权益比率(与德国相反)。 (7)非银行类公司比银行类公司利润更高。两者之间的差异甚至比德国更大。然而,他们还必须承担更高的风险。 (8)显然,日本的银行政策与德国的银行有很大不同:银行强迫银行附属公司遵循投资政策,这种政策要更加谨慎,因此导致盈利能力下降。这再次导致了一项银行政策,该政策可以为这些公司提供更多的借款。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miarka Tobias; Yang Jianping;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号