首页> 外文OA文献 >The association between income inequality and mental health: Social cohesion or social infrastructure?
【2h】

The association between income inequality and mental health: Social cohesion or social infrastructure?

机译:收入不平等与心理健康之间的关系:社会凝聚力还是社会基础设施?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A large literature has emerged around the strong association between income inequality and average life expectancy and a range of health outcomes including mental well being. Three possible explanations for the association have been offered: that the association is a statistical artefact; the 'social cohesion hypothesis' and lastly, the 'neo-materialist hypothesis'. We examine the ability of these hypotheses to explain the link between income inequality and mental well being in data from 30 countries from the European Quality of Life Survey (2007). Our results offer support to the social cohesion and neo-materialist explanations but evidence for the neo-materialist hypothesis is strongest. Measures of expenditure on social protection and the quality of a range of social services reduce the coefficient measuring income inequality by over two thirds and render it insignificant. However, variables measuring social cohesion such as trust in others, civic participation and social contact reduce the income inequality coefficient by 44% and provide the best fitting model as measured by AIC value.
机译:关于收入不平等与平均预期寿命与一系列健康结果(包括心理健康)之间的紧密联系,已经出现了大量文献。对于这种关联,提供了三种可能的解释:关联是一种统计伪像; “社会凝聚力假说”,最后是“新物质主义假说”。我们从欧洲生活质量调查(2007年)的30个国家的数据中检验了这些假设解释收入不平等与心理健康之间联系的能力。我们的结果为社会凝聚力和新唯物主义的解释提供了支持,但是新唯物主义假说的证据最有力。衡量社会保护支出和一系列社会服务质量的方法将衡量收入不平等的系数减少了三分之二以上,使其变得微不足道。但是,衡量社会凝聚力的变量,例如对他人的信任,公民参与和社会接触,会使收入不平等系数降低44%,并提供以AIC值衡量的最佳拟合模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号