首页> 外文OA文献 >The history and legal position of Confucianism in postindependence
【2h】

The history and legal position of Confucianism in postindependence

机译:儒家思想在后独立中的历史与法律地位

摘要

The article traces the mixed fortunes of Confucianism in post-Independence Indonesia. The main problem lay in the question whether Confucianism should be regarded as “a religion” or not, and in this regard higher and lower laws conflicted. Faced with these dificulties, many Chinese declared themselves to be Buddhists, for the Buddhist religion was unambiguously recognised. Details are provided of an interesting case in which the registration of an apparently valid Confucian marriage was refused. However, it is argued, the constitution provides for freedom of religion, and this is the higher law. The fundamental legal position is therefore not problematic in itself, but the application of the law leaves much to be desired. (This paper is one of several which were presented at the regional IAHR conference in Indonesia -Yogyakarta and Semarang - in September/October 2004, but which were not published in the selected proceedings.)
机译:本文追溯了印尼独立后儒家的幸命运。主要问题在于是否应将儒教视为“一种宗教”,并且在这方面,上下法律之间存在冲突。面对这些困难,许多中国人宣称自己是佛教徒,因为佛教宗教得到了明确的承认。提供了一个有趣的案例的详细信息,该案例中,显然有效的儒家婚姻的注册被拒绝。但是,有人认为,宪法规定了宗教自由,这是更高的法律。因此,基本的法律地位本身并不存在问题,但是法律的适用仍有许多不足之处。 (本文是2004年9月/ 10月在印度尼西亚地区IAHR会议-日惹和三宝垄上发表的论文中的几篇,但未在选定的论文集中发表。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Heriyanto Yang;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 21:02:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号