首页> 外文OA文献 >Providing Databases for Different Indoor Positioning Technologies: Pros and Cons of Magnetic Field and Wi-Fi Based Positioning
【2h】

Providing Databases for Different Indoor Positioning Technologies: Pros and Cons of Magnetic Field and Wi-Fi Based Positioning

机译:为不同的室内定位技术提供数据库:磁场和基于Wi-Fi的定位的优缺点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Localization is one of the main pillars for indoor services. However, it is still very difficult for the mobile sensing community tocompare state-of-the-art indoor positioning systems due to the scarcity of publicly available databases. To make fair and meaningfulcomparisons between indoor positioning systems, they must be evaluated in the same situation, or in the same sets of situations. Inthis paper, two databases are introduced for studying the performance of magnetic field and Wi-Fi fingerprinting based positioningsystems in the same environment (i.e., indoor area). The “magnetic” database contains more than 40,000 discrete captures (270continuous samples), whereas the “Wi-Fi” one contains 1,140 ones. The environment and both databases are fully detailed in thispaper. A set of experiments is also presented where two simple but effective baselines have been developed to test the suitability ofthe databases. Finally, the pros and cons of both types of positioning techniques are discussed in detail.
机译:本地化是室内服务的主要支柱之一。但是,由于缺乏公共数据库,移动传感社区仍然很难比较先进的室内定位系统。为了在室内定位系统之间进行公平有意义的比较,必须在相同的情况下或在相同的情况下对它们进行评估。本文介绍了两个数据库,用于研究在相同环境(即室内区域)中磁场和基于Wi-Fi指纹识别的定位系统的性能。 “磁性”数据库包含40,000多个离散捕获(270个连续样本),而“ Wi-Fi”数据库则包含1,140个。本文对环境和两个数据库进行了详细介绍。还提出了一组实验,其中开发了两个简单但有效的基准来测试数据库的适用性。最后,详细讨论了两种定位技术的利弊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号