This study provides an economic analysis of the post-War institutions of theEuropean tenancy markets. Two representative types of market interventionsare analyzed: the introduction of compulsory terms in the tenancy contractsand rent control. First of all this study offers a description and an analysis ofthe recent history of those institutions. The cases of Spain (as a benchmark),Italy, Finland and UK are analyzed more in depth, as examples of "bigreformers" during the 20th century, in order to extract some generalconclusions about the evolution of the European institutions in the last decades.Then the effects of those interventions are theoretically explored by adapting amodel of tenancy markets (Basu and Emerson, 2000). The results show thatthe analyzed institutions potentially entail negative effects for the Europeantenancy markets. Those effects are consistent with the tendences observedduring the second half of the 20th century in the different european markets.
展开▼
机译：这项研究提供了对欧洲租赁市场战后制度的经济学分析。分析了两种有代表性的市场干预类型：在租赁合同中引入强制性条款和租金控制。首先，本研究对这些机构的近期历史进行了描述和分析。对西班牙（作为基准），意大利，芬兰和英国的案例进行了更深入的分析，以作为20世纪“大改革者”的例子，以期得出有关欧洲机构近几十年来演变的一些一般性结论。然后，通过改编租赁市场模型从理论上探讨这些干预措施的效果（Basu and Emerson，2000）。结果表明，所分析的机构可能对欧洲租赁市场产生负面影响。这些影响与20世纪下半叶在不同欧洲市场上观察到的趋势一致。
展开▼
