首页> 外文OA文献 >Localized re-definition of legal justice: the feminine of the south in the early constitutional transition and its practice by the Consumer Protection Office of the MPDFT-Brasilia-Brazil - a framework for cross-border disputes in EC Consumer Law and policy
【2h】

Localized re-definition of legal justice: the feminine of the south in the early constitutional transition and its practice by the Consumer Protection Office of the MPDFT-Brasilia-Brazil - a framework for cross-border disputes in EC Consumer Law and policy

机译:重新定义法律公正:宪法过渡初期的南方女性及其MPDFT-巴西利亚-巴西消费者保护办公室的实践-欧盟消费者法和政策中的跨境争议框架

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis presents an alternative reading of law as a way to settleudconflicts and dispense justice through the eyes of the feminine and their ethics ofudcare as elaborated by Carol Gilligan. An elective articulation between culturaludfeminism and postmodern ethics has been defended rather than coincidence. It showsudthe aporias of modernity through the reading of postmodernity, especially theudundeniable exigencies of Levinas’ ethics of alterity and the reading done by Derridaudof Benjamin’s characterization of law as violence. The challenges of postmodernityudin those respects remain and then the findings of Gilligan’s different voice areudarticulated to offer a possible Aufhebung . No coincidence is defended but a properudarticulation is defended. This thesis defends a reconceptualisation of justice as audfeminine virtue within a postmodern paradigm of law and its rematerialization andudreflexiveness as well the advancement of Relational Contract Theory and Need-udOriented Contact Theory. It explores early practices of Consumer Protection Officeudof MPDFT-Brasilia-Brazil which were responding to a transition constitutionaludsituation after the redemocratization of the country and were an institutional lostudparadigm of justice as a feminine virtue. The desired outcome is to identify audpossible framework for justice as care, considering a manifold diagnosed gap inudconsumer justice in the EC.
机译:本论文提出了一种替代性的法律解读方法,它是通过卡罗尔·吉利根(Carol Gilligan)阐述的女性的看法及其 udcare伦理来解决 ud冲突和分配正义的一种方式。在文化女权主义与后现代伦理学之间的选择性表达被捍卫,而不是巧合。它通过阅读后现代性,尤其是列维纳斯的变更伦理学的不可否认的迫切性,以及德里加·本雅明将法律定性为暴力的解读,显示出对现代性的迷茫。后现代性的挑战在这些方面仍然存在,然后吉利根不同声音的发现被清晰地表达出来,以提供可能的奥菲蓬。没有巧合被辩护,但是适当的明确的辩护被辩护。本文主张在后现代法律范式中将正义作为一种女性美德重新概念化,并捍卫其对物化和非自反性的要求,以及关系合同理论和以需求为导向的接触理论的发展。它探讨了MPDFT-巴西利亚-巴西消费者保护办公室 udof的早期做法,这些做法是在国家重新民主化之后对过渡宪法处境的一种回应,并且是作为女性美德的一种制度上的迷失 udd范式。期望的结果是,考虑到EC中消费者诊断/消费者司法方面的多种诊断差距,确定一个作为司法服务的不可能的框架。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号