首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of method of preparation of passive diffusion tubes for measurement of ambient nitrogen dioxide
【2h】

Evaluation of method of preparation of passive diffusion tubes for measurement of ambient nitrogen dioxide

机译:评价用于测量环境二氧化氮的无源扩散管的方法的评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study was carried out in response to suggestions that the measurement of NO2 by Palmes-type passive diffusion tubes (PDT) is affected by the method of preparation of the triethanolamine (TEA) absorbent coating on the grids. The following combinations of factors were investigated: TEA solvent (acetone or water), volume composition of TEA in solvent (50% or 20%), and grid coating method (dipping in solution prior to assembly or pipetting solution on after assembly). Duplicate PDTs prepared by each of the 8 methods were exposed in parallel, in urban air, for a total of 80 separate 1 week exposures. NO2 concentrations derived from PDTs prepared by pipetting methods were significantly less precise than concentrations from dipping methods, with mean RSDs for duplicate measurements of 13.8% and 8.5%, respectively (n = 316 each category). Pipetting methods using solutions of 50% TEA composition were particularly imprecise (mean RSD 17.2%). Data from PDTs prepared by pipetting methods were systematically more poorly correlated with each other and with data from co-located chemiluminescence analysers, than corresponding data from PDTs prepared by dipping methods, indicating that more consistent accuracy was also obtained by the latter PDTs. The statistical evidence suggested that PDTs prepared by pipetting 50% TEA in water generally gave lower NO2 concentrations. Although this is in agreement with a previous study, it is also possible that such an observation here may be a statistical artefact given the demonstrably poorer precision of this method. The general tendency of PDTs to show positive bias in NO2 measurement in urban air in 1 week exposures was again evident in this study (mean biases at roadside and urban centre locations of +35% (n = 475) and +18% (n = 112), respectively) consistent with augmentation of within-tube NO2 flux by chemical reaction between co-diffusing NO and O3. Overall, it is recommended that the pipetting method of PDT grid preparation is avoided, or at least investigated further, because of the apparent degradation in precision and accuracy of NO2 measurement. Potential reasons for the effect are discussed.
机译:响应于有人提出的建议,进行该研究是因为Palmes型被动扩散管(PDT)对NO2的测量受到网格上三乙醇胺(TEA)吸收剂涂层的制备方法的影响。研究了以下因素的组合:TEA溶剂(丙酮或水),TEA在溶剂中的体积组成(50%或20%)和网格涂覆方法(组装前浸入溶液中或组装后吸移溶液中)。通过8种方法中的每一种制备的重复的PDT在城市空气中平行暴露,总共进行80次单独的1周暴露。通过移液方法制备的PDT中的NO2浓度要比通过浸渍方法制备的NO2浓度精确度低得多,重复测量的平均RSD分别为13.8%和8.5%(每类n = 316)。使用50%TEA组成的溶液进行移液的方法特别不精确(平均RSD为17.2%)。与通过浸渍方法制备的PDT的相应数据相比,通过移液方法制备的PDT的数据彼此之间以及与位于同一位置的化学发光分析仪的数据之间的系统关联性更差,这表明后者的PDT也获得了更一致的准确性。统计证据表明,通过在水中移液50%TEA制备的PDT通常会降低NO2浓度。尽管这与先前的研究相一致,但鉴于此方法的精度明显较差,因此此处的观察结果也可能是统计伪像。在这项研究中,PDT的总体趋势在暴露于城市空气中1周的NO2中显示出正偏差(在路边和城市中心位置的平均偏差分别为+ 35%(n = 475)和+ 18%(n = 112)分别与通过共扩散NO和O3之间的化学反应增加管内NO2流量相一致。总体而言,由于NO2测量的精确度和准确性会明显下降,因此建议避免或至少应进一步研究PDT格栅制备的移液方法。讨论了造成这种影响的潜在原因。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号