首页> 外文OA文献 >Soft contact lens cleaning : rub or no-rub?
【2h】

Soft contact lens cleaning : rub or no-rub?

机译:隐形眼镜的软清洁:擦还是不擦?

摘要

Purpose: To compare effectiveness of cleaning with and without rubbing of soft contact lenses. Methods: Three-hundred new biweekly disposable hydrogel lenses (Ocufilcon D, FDA Group IV; 55% water content) were artificially deposited with serum albumin, hand cream (semi-transparent deposits) and mascara (black deposits). The treated lenses were randomly divided into three groups, each group cleaned by one of three methods of cleaning - Rubbing (R), No-Rub following the manufacturer's instruction on duration of rinsing (NR1) and No-Rub with a shorter duration of rinsing (NR2). Four commercially-available multipurpose solutions (MPS) and a saline were used. The cleaning effectiveness was determined by the amount of deposits remaining on the contact lenses after cleaning, assessed with the aid of a slit-lamp. The level of deposits remaining (in terms of coverage of lens surface) were determined using a five-point scale [0 (no observable deposits) - 4 (>80% deposits remained)] for semi-transparent deposits (protein and hand cream) and black deposits (mascara). The investigators were masked as to the solutions used (except for one MPS which has a different rinsing time than the other MPS), and the investigator who assessed the deposits left on the lenses did not know which solution or cleaning method was used to clean each lens. Results: Lenses cleaned by the R method were significantly cleaner than those cleaned by methods NR1 and NR2. No significant difference was found between lenses cleaned by NR1 and NR2 methods. The median grade of deposits for lenses cleaned by R method was 0.5 for both semi-transparent and black deposits. For lenses cleaned by NR1 and NR2 methods, the median grade of deposits left on lens surfaces was 4.0 for both types of deposits. Different solutions used did not affect the level of deposits left on lens surfaces for all three cleaning methods. Conclusions: Not rubbing the soft lens when cleaning is ineffective in removing loosely-bound deposits. A longer rinse, as recommended by the manufacturers, does not remove significantly more deposits than a shorter rinse with the MPS. This work supports the view that contact lens wearers should be encouraged to rub their lenses when cleaning.
机译:目的:比较使用软性隐形眼镜和不使用软性隐形眼镜的清洁效果。方法:将三百个新的两周一次的一次性水凝胶镜片(Ocufilcon D,FDA IV组;水含量55%)与血清白蛋白,护手霜(半透明沉积物)和睫毛膏(黑色沉积物)人工沉积。将经过处理的镜片随机分为三组,每组用以下三种清洁方法之一进行清洁-擦拭(R),按照制造商的冲洗持续时间(NR1)的说明进行无擦拭和以较短的冲洗持续时间进行擦拭(NR2)。使用了四种市售的多用途溶液(MPS)和盐水。清洁效果由清洁后保留在隐形眼镜上的沉积物数量决定,并借助于裂隙灯评估。使用半点式沉积物(蛋白质和护手霜)的五点刻度[0(无可观察到的沉积物)-4(剩余的沉积物> 80%)]来确定剩余的沉积物水平(以镜片表面的覆盖度为准)。和黑色沉积物(睫毛膏)。研究人员对使用的溶液不了解(一个MPS的冲洗时间与另一种MPS的漂洗时间不同),并且评估镜片上沉积物的研究人员不知道使用哪种溶液或清洁方法来清洁每种溶液镜片。结果:用R方法清洗过的镜片比用NR1和NR2清洗过的镜片清洁得多。在用NR1和NR2方法清洗的镜片之间没有发现显着差异。对于半透明和黑色沉积物,通过R方法清洗的镜片沉积物的中位等级均为0.5。对于通过NR1和NR2方法清洁过的镜片,两种沉积物在镜片表面残留的沉积物的中位等级均为4.0。对于所有三种清洁方法,使用的不同溶液均不会影响镜片表面残留的沉积物水平。结论:清洁时不能擦拭软镜对清除松动的沉积物无效。按照制造商的建议,较长的冲洗不会比使用MPS较短的冲洗去除更多的沉积物。这项工作支持这样一种观点,即应鼓励隐形眼镜佩戴者在清洁时擦拭他们的眼镜。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号