This paper presents finite element (FE) based pushover analysis of a reinforced concrete structure with a two-leaf cavity wall (TLCW) to estimate the performance level of this structure. In addition to this, an unreinforced masonry (URM) model was selected for comparison. Simulations and analyses of these structures were performed using the DIANA FE program. The mentioned structures were selected as two storeys and two bays. The dimensions of the structures were scaled 1:1.5 according to the Cauchy Froude similitude law. A shake table experiment was implemented on the reinforced concrete structure with the two-leaf cavity wall (TLCW) at the National Civil Engineering Laboratory (LNEC) in Lisbon, Portugal. The model that simulates URM was not experimentally studied. This structure was modelled in the same manner as the TLCW. The purpose of this virtual model is to compare the respective performances. Two nonlinear analyses were performed and compared with the experimental test results. These analyses were carried out in two phases. The research addresses first the analysis of a structure with only reinforced concrete elements, and secondly the analysis of the same structure with reinforced concrete elements and infill walls. Both researches consider static loading and pushover analysis. The experimental pushover curve was plotted by the envelope of the experimental curve obtained on the basis of the shake table records. Crack patterns, failure modes and performance curves were plotted for both models. Finally, results were evaluated on the basis of the current regulation ASCE/SEI 41-06.
展开▼
机译:本文介绍了基于有限元(FE)的两叶腔壁(TLCW)钢筋混凝土结构的推覆分析,以评估该结构的性能水平。除此之外,还选择了无筋砌体(URM)模型进行比较。使用DIANA FE程序对这些结构进行了仿真和分析。提到的结构被选为两层和两个海湾。根据柯西·弗劳德(Cauchy Froude)相似定律,将结构的尺寸按1:1.5比例缩放。在葡萄牙里斯本的国家土木工程实验室(LNEC)对带有两叶腔墙(TLCW)的钢筋混凝土结构进行了振动台试验。尚未通过实验研究模拟URM的模型。该结构的建模方式与TLCW相同。该虚拟模型的目的是比较各自的性能。进行了两次非线性分析,并与实验测试结果进行了比较。这些分析分两个阶段进行。该研究首先针对仅具有钢筋混凝土元素的结构进行分析,其次针对具有钢筋混凝土元素和填充墙的相同结构进行分析。两项研究都考虑了静态载荷和推覆分析。通过在摇表记录的基础上获得的实验曲线的包络线绘制实验推倒曲线。绘制了两种模型的裂纹模式,破坏模式和性能曲线。最后,根据现行法规ASCE / SEI 41-06对结果进行评估。
展开▼