首页> 外文OA文献 >Why A Cyberterrorism Focused ‘Data Governance Policy’ Would Win in India Where a “Draft National Encryption Policy” Could Not
【2h】

Why A Cyberterrorism Focused ‘Data Governance Policy’ Would Win in India Where a “Draft National Encryption Policy” Could Not

机译:为什么以网络恐怖主义为中心的“数据治理政策”在印度胜出,而“国家加密政策草案”却无法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Data Governance is a major area of concern globally. It evokes sharp reactions and divides nation along sharp fault lines. The stakes are high for businesses, for citizens and governments, all alike. A few days ago, the Indian government published its Draft National Encryption Policy. The badly written draft met with stiff public and political resistance. The emergent public resistance driven by lack of conceptual knowledge except in very informed circles leading to fear of big government snooping on citizens and the spiralling media frenzy led the government to withdraw the well-intentioned, albeit technically flawed, draft. Hereunder, I discuss the flaws of the policy that led to its early demise, the focus that the draft should have had, the underlying exigent national security imperatives, trade-off between the sovereignty of India and the individual freedom of Indians and the policy options ahead of the government to device a cogent data governance policy in India.
机译:数据治理是全球关注的主要领域。它引起了尖锐的反应,并沿着尖锐的断层线分裂了国家。对于企业,公民和政府而言,风险都是很高的。几天前,印度政府发布了国家加密政策草案。这份草稿写得不好,遭到了公众和政治的强烈反对。由于缺乏概念性知识而引起的公众反抗,除了在知识渊博的圈子中,导致人们担心大型政府对公民的窥探,以及媒体狂热的加剧,导致政府撤回了原意明确但技术上有缺陷的草案。在下文中,我将讨论导致其早期消亡的政策缺陷,草案应具有的重点,潜在的紧迫的国家安全势在必行,印度主权与印第安人个人自由之间的权衡以及政策选择提前在印度实施强有力的数据治理政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Panda Shashanka Shekhar;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号