首页> 外文OA文献 >Are We Ready for Mass Fatality Incidents? Preparedness of the US Mass Fatality Infrastructure
【2h】

Are We Ready for Mass Fatality Incidents? Preparedness of the US Mass Fatality Infrastructure

机译:我们准备好应对大规模死亡事故吗?美国大规模死亡基础设施的防备

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective To assess the preparedness of the US mass fatality infrastructure, we developed and tested metrics for 3 components of preparedness: organizational, operational, and resource sharing networks. Methods In 2014, data were collected from 5 response sectors: medical examiners and coroners, the death care industry, health departments, faith-based organizations, and offices of emergency management. Scores were calculated within and across sectors and a weighted score was developed for the infrastructure. Results A total of 879 respondents reported highly variable organizational capabilities: 15% had responded to a mass fatality incident (MFI); 42% reported staff trained for an MFI, but only 27% for an MFI involving hazardous contaminants. Respondents estimated that 75% of their staff would be willing and able to respond, but only 53% if contaminants were involved. Most perceived their organization as somewhat prepared, but 13% indicated “not at all.” Operational capability scores ranged from 33% (death care industry) to 77% (offices of emergency management). Network capability analysis found that only 42% of possible reciprocal relationships between resource-sharing partners were present. The cross-sector composite score was 51%; that is, half the key capabilities for preparedness were in place. Conclusions The sectors in the US mass fatality infrastructure report suboptimal capability to respond. National leadership is needed to ensure sector-specific and infrastructure-wide preparedness for a large-scale MFI.
机译:目的为了评估美国大规模死亡基础设施的备灾情况,我们针对备灾的三个组成部分开发并测试了指标:组织,运营和资源共享网络。方法2014年,我们从5个响应部门收集了数据:体检医师和验尸官,死亡护理行业,卫生部门,基于信仰的组织和应急管理办公室。计算部门内和跨部门的分数,并为基础架构开发加权分数。结果共有879名受访者报告了高度可变的组织能力:15%的人死于大规模死亡事件(MFI); 42%的员工报告说他们接受了MFI的培训,但是只有27%的员工接受了涉及危险污染物的MFI。受访者估计他们的员工中有75%愿意并且能够做出响应,但是如果涉及到污染物,则只有53%。大多数人认为他们的组织有所准备,但是13%的人表示“根本没有”。运营能力得分范围从33%(死亡护理行业)到77%(应急管理办公室)。网络能力分析发现,资源共享伙伴之间仅存在42%的可能相互关系。跨部门综合得分为51%;也就是说,准备工作的关键能力已达到一半。结论美国大规模死亡基础设施部门报告的应对能力欠佳。需要国家领导才能确保大规模小额信贷机构的针对特定部门和基础架构的准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号