首页> 外文OA文献 >New visions, old practices: policy and regulation in the internet era
【2h】

New visions, old practices: policy and regulation in the internet era

机译:新视野,旧做法:互联网时代的政策法规

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Raymond Williams’ comment applies as much to the media and communication systems of his time as it does to today’s Internet era. As Silverstone (2007: 26) wrote, “mediated connection and interconnection define the dominant infrastructure for the conduct of social, political and economic life across the globe”. The Internet is no more a neutral configuration of technologies than was the earlier media and communication system. If there are forces that are shaping the Internet’s development in ways that are not equitable then there is a case for countering them. This paper offers an assessment of current trends in policy and regulation that bear on the Internet. The aim is to discern whether visions of a post-neoliberal period are visible in policy and regulatory practice in this area. Though some argue that developments in Internet governance are beginning to wrest control of the Internet away from state or private sector influence, I suggest that this is a very one-sided view. In this paper, I argue that the forces influencing Internet developments are not benign because an unregulated Internet is unlikely to maximise the benefits of the Internet for all. This paper focuses on corporate interests in the Internet’s evolution and on the state’s role in regulating various components of the infrastructure and services that employ the Internet. The following section considers the paradoxical alliance between the neoliberal agenda and the advocates of the open unregulated Internet. The impact of the neoliberal agenda on the telecommunication, broadcast and Internet segments of the media and communication industry is then considered briefly, providing a basis for a more in-depth consideration of the incentives encouraging corporate actors to engage in monopolisation strategies as a means of maximising their profits. In the penultimate section, the likelihood of a shift to policy based on a post-neoliberal paradigm is explored through an examination of some recent developments in network infrastructure, broadcast content and radio frequency spectrum policy.
机译:雷蒙德·威廉姆斯(Raymond Williams)的评论不仅适用于他那个时代的媒体和通讯系统,也适用于当今的互联网时代。正如希尔弗斯通(Silverstone,2007:26)所写,“中介连接和互连定义了全球社会,政治和经济生活行为的主要基础设施”。与早期的媒体和通信系统相比,Internet不再是一种中立的技术配置。如果有力量以不公平的方式影响着互联网的发展,那么就有必要对付它们。本文对互联网上当前的政策和法规趋势进行了评估。目的是辨别在此领域的政策和监管实践中是否可以看到新的无遗期的愿景。尽管有些人认为互联网治理的发展已开始将互联网的控制权从国家或私营部门的影响中夺走,但我认为这是一种单方面的观点。在本文中,我认为影响互联网发展的力量不是良性的,因为不受监管的互联网不可能使所有人的互联网利益最大化。本文着重于企业对Internet的发展的兴趣以及该州在规范使用Internet的基础结构和服务的各个组成部分中的作用。下一节考虑了新自由主义议程与开放无管制的互联网倡导者之间的自相矛盾的联盟。然后简要地考虑了新自由主义议程对媒体和通信行业的电信,广播和互联网领域的影响,为更深入地考虑鼓励企业行为者参与垄断策略作为一种手段的激励措施提供了基础。最大化他们的利润。在倒数第二节中,通过研究网络基础结构,广播内容和无线电频谱政策的一些最新发展,探索了基于新的后神经网络范式转向政策的可能性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mansell Robin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号