首页> 外文OA文献 >Ethical Educational Interventions: Perceptions of Accounting Students and Graduates and the Legitimation of 'Ethical' Actions
【2h】

Ethical Educational Interventions: Perceptions of Accounting Students and Graduates and the Legitimation of 'Ethical' Actions

机译:道德教育干预:对会计专业学生和毕业生的看法以及“道德”行为的合法性

摘要

The issue of ethical educational interventions in the accounting classroom is not new. As far back as 1967, the Horizon for a Profession: The common body of knowledge for certified public accountants study indicated that if [t]here were no ethical foundation to the profession then there would in fact be no profession (p. 14). The 1984 Bedford Report identified the need for higher education to develop the entering accountant's ability to think, to communicate, and to understand the nature and role of ethics. The Treadway Commission (1987) and the Accounting Education Change Commission (1990) both cited the need for young professionals to be able to make ethical and value-based judgements. The 2004 Ethics Education Task Force Report to the AACSB stated that business schools must encourage students to develop a deep understanding of the myriad challenges surrounding corporate responsibility and corporate governance and provide them with tools for recognizing and responding to ethical issues, both personally and organisationally. The 2006 Information Paper: Approaches to the development and maintenance of professional values, ethics and attitudes in accounting education programs commissioned by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) found that, while there was overall growing interest in professional and business programs responding to the call for greater ethics coverage in the curricula (p. 13), the conclusion was that overall ethics coverage in accounting programs appears minimal (p. 13).These international research studies demonstrate that there have been ongoing requests for ethical educational interventions at the tertiary level of education. However, in New Zealand little research has been done on this issue. This research on the issue of ethical educational interventions in the New Zealand accounting tertiary level curriculum therefore will contribute significantly to knowledge in this area. Furthermore, this study makes another significant contribution to studies on ethical educational interventions because it attempted to find out the perceptions and beliefs held by important but seemingly forgotten stakeholders: accounting students and graduates on the importance of having ethical educational interventions in the accounting curriculum. This approach was taken because it was important to find out directly from the individuals in whom accounting educators are trying to develop important competencies and skills through their university studies, whether or not they perceived that such interventions would have any influence in their ethical decision-making behaviour. Therefore a comparative and longitudinal study using questionnaire survey instruments and semi-structured interviews was conducted with accounting students and graduates. A mixed methods methodology approach was taken to analyse the quantitative and qualitative data subsequently collected from the respondents.What makes this study particularly important is that accounting students and graduates are directly being asked what they think about the issue of ethical educational interventions in the classroom. Do they believe that such interventions would help them become more ethical accountants (individuals) in the real world? Do they believe that such interventions would influence their ethical decision-making behaviour for the better? In addition, they were also asked about the factors they saw as being the most influential on their behaviour and ethical decision-making. This study is therefore important because, from these very important groups of individuals (stakeholders), the benefits of ethical educational interventions in the classroom and whether they would help to develop a better understanding of ethical reasoning and ethics education issues could be explored. After all, the participants of this study are the individuals aspiring to become future chartered accountants of accounting firms and/or future financial controllers and chief executives of businesses. This study makes a further contribution to the knowledge and theory on accounting and ethics education research because it also looked at the legitimation of 'ethical' actions (legitimacy theory) by exploring ethical theories initially and then using these triangulated theories to interpret accounting students' and graduates' responses to hypothetical situations in an attempt to understand their ethical reasoning. The continuing accounting scandals and corporate crises mean that accounting educators and professional practicing accountants (which accounting students and graduates will aspire to when they commence their accounting careers) all have to cringe when their professional ethics are questioned after each accounting debacle. This is because both accounting educators and practitioners have to read about their members falling from grace through inappropriate ethical behaviour. The question of whether or not these members received appropriate instruction through their learning at university always becomes a prominent issue and there is increasing research to suggest that what accounting educators have been teaching has been woefully inadequate in addressing the ethical stances of accounting students and graduates.The questionnaire findings from Section II: Hypothetical Ethical Cases raise some concern. The inability of a significant percentage of accounting students and graduates to identify correctly whether an action was ethical or unethical is quite concerning as the three hypothetical ethical cases were not so complex that the respondents were unable to distinguish between the two conditions. The question arises as to whether these respondents were less sure because they saw such actions as being 'acceptable' to society and therefore, in their minds, legitimate 'ethical' actions to take in the situation. The findings of Section III: Hypothetical Ethical Situations are also of concern in that significant percentages of accounting students and graduates showed themselves as potentially willing participants in unethical and, in some instances, illegal behaviour. The implications of these two findings suggest that more attention needs to be paid to the type of ethical educational interventions that accounting students receive so that the ethical reasoning of individuals can be improved and they understand better what appropriate legitimate ethical actions for society really are. Without this understanding, it can be argued that accounting students and graduates will find it difficult to withstand the legitimacy whirlpool that will draw them straight into the midst of unethical behaviour that seems 'acceptable' to society because it is legal but nevertheless raises questions about the true integrity and professionalism of accountants in practice.The overall findings from this research study indicate that accounting students and graduates perceived ethics education to have only a moderate influence on their ethical behaviour. The majority of accounting students and graduates believed that by the time they reached university studies, their personal values and behaviour had become entrenched and therefore would have more influence on the way they interacted in the corporate world. However, the majority of respondents in this study still believed that it was important to have ethics education in their degree programmes as they believed that this exposure would help them learn how to resolve ethical situations more appropriately if they were ever to be confronted with such situations. This important finding suggests that the type of ethical educational interventions we expose students to will, therefore, have to be carefully thought out by education providers. The issue of legitimation in what might appear to be 'ethical' actions but are really questionable in terms of whether the 'social contract' between the individual (the focus being the accountant for this study) and society is honoured appropriately also becomes an important area to consider in ethics education. Accounting educators therefore need to look carefully at their goals for ethics education so that the curriculum they deliver will have more than a moderate influence on accounting students and graduates when they join the professional and corporate world. It cannot be stressed enough that accounting educators need to maximise the opportunity to influence their students' learning; so that these students leave university with a better mindset of ethical values and socially responsible business practices. A schematic encapsulation of this ethical educational intervention doctoral thesis is provided to summarise the important research directions and findings of this study. The encapsulation highlights the research contributions to knowledge that this study makes and provides a critical reflection on the issue of accounting ethics education.
机译:会计课堂中的道德教育干预问题并不新鲜。早在1967年,《专业视野:注册会计师的共同知识体系》就指出,如果没有专业的道德基础,那么实际上就没有专业(第14页)。 1984年的《贝德福德报告》确定了高等教育的需要,以发展入职会计师的思考,沟通和理解道德的本质和作用的能力。特雷德韦委员会(1987)和会计教育改革委员会(1990)均指出,年轻专业人员必须能够做出符合道德和基于价值的判断。 2004年提交给AACSB的道德教育工作组报告指出,商学院必须鼓励学生深刻理解围绕公司责任和公司治理的诸多挑战,并为他们提供个人和组织上承认和应对道德问题的工具。由国际会计师联合会(IFAC)委托进行的2006年《信息文件:在会计教育计划中发展和维护专业价值观,道德操守和态度的方法》发现,尽管人们对响应这一呼吁的专业和商业计划的兴趣日益增长为了使课程中的道德规范覆盖面更大(第13页),结论是会计计划中的总体道德规范覆盖面似乎很小(第13页)。这些国际研究表明,一直存在着对高等教育方面的道德教育干预的要求教育之中。但是,在新西兰很少对此问题进行研究。因此,这项有关新西兰会计高等教育课程中道德教育干预问题的研究将极大地促进这一领域的知识。此外,该研究对道德教育干预措施的研究做出了另一重要贡献,因为它试图找出重要但貌似已被遗忘的利益相关者所持有的看法和信念:会计学生和毕业生关于在会计课程中采用道德教育干预措施的重要性。之所以采用这种方法,是因为很重要的一点是,必须直接从会计教育工作者试图通过其大学学习来培养重要能力和技能的个人中找出,无论他们是否认为此类干预措施会对他们的道德决策产生影响行为。因此,采用问卷调查工具和半结构化访谈对会计专业学生和毕业生进行了比较和纵向研究。采取了一种混合方法方法论方法来分析随后从受访者那里收集的定量和定性数据。这项研究尤其重要的是,直接询问会计学生和毕业生对课堂中道德教育干预问题的看法。他们是否相信这样的干预措施将有助于他们成为现实世界中更具道德的会计师(个人)?他们是否相信这样的干预会更好地影响其道德决策行为?此外,他们还被问到他们认为对自己的行为和道德决策影响最大的因素。因此,这项研究非常重要,因为可以从这些非常重要的个人(利益相关者)群体中,探讨课堂上进行道德教育干预的好处,以及它们是否有助于更好地理解道德推理和道德教育问题。毕竟,这项研究的参与者是渴望成为会计师事务所和/或未来的财务控制人员和企业首席执行官的特许会计师的个人。这项研究为会计和道德教育研究的知识和理论做出了进一步的贡献,因为它还通过首先探讨道德理论,然后使用这些三角理论来解释会计学生的行为和道德,从而研究了“道德”行为(合法性理论)的合法性。毕业生对假设情况的反应,以试图理解其道德推理。持续的会计丑闻和公司危机意味着,每次会计崩溃之后,当对他们的职业道德提出质疑时,会计教育者和专业执业会计师(会计专业的学生和毕业生将在其职业生涯开始时向往)。这是因为会计教育者和从业者都必须阅读有关其成员因不适当的道德行为而从恩典中堕落的信息。这些成员是否在大学期间通过学习获得适当的指导的问题始终是一个突出的问题,并且越来越多的研究表明,会计教育者所教的内容严重不足以解决会计学生和毕业生的道德立场。第二节:假想的伦理案例的问卷调查结果引起了一些关注。相当大比例的会计专业学生和毕业生无法正确识别某项行为是道德的还是不道德的,这非常令人担忧,因为这三种假设的道德案例并不那么复杂,以致受访者无法区分这两种情况。问题是,这些受访者是否不太确定,因为他们认为这样的行为对社会是“可以接受的”,因此在他们看来是在情况下采取的合理的“道德”行为。第三部分:假想的道德状况的发现也令人关注,因为有很大比例的会计专业学生和毕业生表明自己是潜在的不道德行为的参与者,在某些情况下是非法行为。这两个发现的含义表明,需要更多地关注会计专业学生接受的道德教育干预类型,以便可以改善个人的道德推理,并且他们可以更好地理解什么是对社会真正适当的合法道德行为。没有这种理解,就可能会争辩说,会计专业的学生和毕业生将难以承受合法性的漩涡,这将使他们直接陷入社会似乎“可以接受”的不道德行为之中,因为这是合法的,但仍然引发了对合法性的质疑。这项研究的总体结果表明,会计专业的学生和毕业生认为道德教育对他们的道德行为仅具有中等程度的影响。大多数会计专业的学生和毕业生相信,当他们进入大学学习时,他们的个人价值观和行为已经根深蒂固,因此将对他们在企业界的互动方式产生更大的影响。但是,本研究中的大多数受访者仍然认为在其学位课程中进行道德教育很重要,因为他们认为,如果他们曾经面对过这种情况,那么他们的接触将有助于他们更恰当地解决道德问题。 。这一重要发现表明,我们向学生展示意愿的道德教育干预类型,因此,必须由教育提供者仔细考虑。在看似“道德”行为的合法性问题上,就个人(本研究的重点是会计师)与社会之间的“社会契约”是否得到适当尊重而言,确实存在疑问,这也成为一个重要领域。在道德教育中考虑。因此,会计教育工作者需要仔细考虑自己的道德教育目标,以便他们提供的课程对会计专业学生和毕业生加入专业和企业界产生更大的影响。不能过分强调会计教育者需要最大限度地利用机会来影响学生的学习;这样,这些学生离开大学时就具有更好的道德价值观和对社会负责的商业惯例。本道德教育干预博士论文的示意图概述了本研究的重要研究方向和发现。封装突出了本研究对知识所做的研究贡献,并提供了对会计道德教育问题的批判性反思。

著录项

  • 作者

    Low Mary;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:53:23

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号