首页> 外文OA文献 >Removal od hydrogen sulfide using upflow and downflow biofilters
【2h】

Removal od hydrogen sulfide using upflow and downflow biofilters

机译:使用上流式和下流式生物滤池去除硫化氢

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Abstract] The objective of this study was to determine the efficiency of different types of biofilters for hydrogen sulfide removal. The study consisted of two parts. The first part compared the hydrogen sulfide removal efficiency among four different biofilter media comprising compost, bamboo fluff soil, lava rock and activated carbon. The test columns were filled with each of the filter media together with coconut shell fiber to increase void as well as nutrient and microorganism seed. All four biofilters were subjected to empty bed residence time of 45, 60 and 75 seconds and hydrogen sulfide concentration ranged from 50 – 300 ppm. The experiment was run at room temperature (26- 33 °C), while the filter moisture was controlled between 60-70%. The measured parameters included gas flowrate, inlet and outlet gas concentration, pressure drop, temperature, moisture, pH, microorganism count, organic matter contents and sulfate contents. The results showed that the compost media could achieve the removal efficiency of 100% with gas inlet concentration of 300 ppm when the height of filter was 1 meter and empty bed residence time was 45 seconds. However, other filter media needed height of filter more than 1.25 meter. Compost, bamboo fluff soil, lava rock and activated carbon achieved the maximum elimination capacity of 122, 111, 72 and 108 g/m3-hr, respectively. The compost was found to be the best biofilter medium and was used in the second part of the study to examine the influence of gas flow direction by comparing the removal efficiencies between upflow and downflow biofilters. This study varied the empty bed residence times of 25, 50 and 75 seconds and hydrogen sulfide concentration was fixed at 300 ppm while other conditions remained as before. It was found that both biofilters could still achieve 100% removal efficiency with residence time as low as 25 seconds if the filter depth was increased to 1.5 meter. The downflow biofilter had removal efficiency similar to upflow biofilter, but slightly less when the filter depth was 1 meter and the empty bed residence time was only 25 seconds.
机译:[摘要]这项研究的目的是确定不同类型的生物滤池去除硫化氢的效率。该研究包括两个部分。第一部分比较了堆肥,竹绒毛土,熔岩和活性炭这四种不同的生物滤池中硫化氢的去除效率。用每种过滤介质以及椰子壳纤维填充测试柱,以增加空隙以及营养和微生物种子。所有四个生物滤池的空床停留时间分别为45、60和75秒,硫化氢浓度范围为50 – 300 ppm。实验在室温(26-33°C)下进行,而过滤器的水分控制在60-70%之间。测得的参数包括气体流量,入口和出口气体浓度,压降,温度,湿度,pH,微生物数量,有机物含量和硫酸盐含量。结果表明,当过滤器高度为1米,空床停留时间为45秒时,堆肥介质在进气浓度为300 ppm时可以达到100%的去除率。但是,其他过滤介质需要过滤器高度超过1.25米。堆肥,竹绒毛土,熔岩和活性炭分别达到122、111、72和108 g / m3-hr的最大清除量。堆肥被认为是最好的生物滤池介质,并在研究的第二部分中用于通过比较上流式和下流式生物滤池的去除效率来检查气体流向的影响。这项研究改变了空床停留时间25、50和75秒,硫化氢浓度固定为300 ppm,而其他条件仍然保持不变。发现如果将过滤器深度增加到1.5米,两个生物过滤器仍可以达到100%的去除效率,停留时间低至25秒。向下流式生物滤池的去除效率与向上流式生物滤池相似,但当过滤器深度为1米且空床停留时间仅为25秒时,去除效率略低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号