首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation of the flexural strength and elastic modulus of resins used for temporary restorations reinforced with particulate glass fibre
【2h】

Evaluation of the flexural strength and elastic modulus of resins used for temporary restorations reinforced with particulate glass fibre

机译:颗粒玻璃纤维增​​强的临时修复用树脂的抗弯强度和弹性模量的评估

摘要

Objective: The flexural strength and the elastic modulus of acrylic resins, Dencor, Duralay and Trim Plus II, were evaluated with and without the addition of silanised glass fibre. Materials and methods: To evaluate the flexural strength and elastic modulus, 60 test specimens were fabricated with the addition of 10% ground silanised glass fibres for the experimental group, and 60 without the incorporation of fibres, for the control group, with 20 test specimens being made of each commercial brand of resin (Dencor, Duralay and Trim Plus II) for the control group and experimental group. After the test specimens had been completed, the flexural strength and elastic modulus tests were performed in a universal testing device, using the three-point bending test. For the specimens without fibres the One-Way Analysis of Variance and the complementary Tukey test were used, and for those with fibres it was not normal, so that the non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was applied. Results: For the flexural strength test, there was no statistical difference (p 0.05) between each commercial brand of resin without fibres [Duralay 84.32(+/- 8.54), Trim plus 85.39(+/- 6.74), Dencor 96.70(+/- 6.52)] and with fibres (Duralay 87.18, Trim plus 88.33, Dencor 98.10). However, for the elastic modulus, there was statistical difference (p 0.01) between each commercial brand of resin without fibres [Duralay 2380.64 (+/- 168.60), Trim plus 2740.37(+/- 311.74), Dencor 2595.42(+/- 261.22)] and with fibres (Duralay 3750.42, Trim plus 3188.80, Dencor 3400.75). Conclusion: The result showed that the incorporation of fibre did not interfere in the flexural strength values, but it increased the values for the elastic modulus.
机译:目的:评估在添加和不添加硅烷化玻璃纤维的情况下,丙烯酸树脂Dencor,Duralay和Trim Plus II的抗弯强度和弹性模量。材料和方法:为了评估抗弯强度和弹性模量,制造了60个试样,其中实验组添加了10%的磨碎的硅烷化玻璃纤维,对于对照组,则制造了60个不掺入纤维的试样,而对照组则制造了20个试样由对照组和实验组的每个商业树脂品牌(Dencor,Duralay和Trim Plus II)制成。在完成试样之后,使用三点弯曲试验在通用试验装置中进行弯曲强度和弹性模量试验。对于无纤维的标本,使用方差的单向分析和互补的Tukey检验,而对于有纤维的标本,这是不正常的,因此应用了非参数Mann-Whitney检验。结果:对于抗弯强度测试,每个无纤维树脂的商业品牌树脂之间没有统计学差异(p> 0.05)[Duralay 84.32(+/- 8.54),Trim plus 85.39(+/- 6.74),Dencor 96.70(+ /-6.52)]和纤维(Duralay 87.18,Trim plus 88.33,Dencor 98.10)。但是,对于弹性模量,每个无纤维树脂品牌的树脂之间的统计差异(p> 0.01)[Duralay 2380.64(+/- 168.60),Trim plus 2740.37(+/- 311.74),Dencor 2595.42(+/-) 261.22)]和纤维(Duralay 3750.42,Trim plus 3188.80,Dencor 3400.75)。结论:结果表明,纤维的掺入不会影响抗弯强度值,但会增加弹性模量值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号